CRS for Bangalore
Overview
Per McKinsey report on India’s urbanization to 2030:
- 590 million people will live in cities, nearly twice the population of US today
- 270 million people will be the net increase working age population
- 70% of net new employment will be generated in cities
- 91 million households will be middle class, up from 22 million today
- 700-900 million sq mtr of commercial & residential space needs to be built, or a new Chicago every year
- 2.5 billion sq mtrs of roads will have to be paved, 20 times the capacity created in the past decade
- 7400 kms of metros & subways will need to be constructed, 20 times the capacity added in the past decade
Bengaluru is a leader in this growth. Per the report, it will have more than 10 million people inhabiting it by 2030, of whom; a majority will be from the middle and lower income group. For them, the urban mobility challenge will only increase as the working population increases and hence, commute will become a major quality of life indicator.
Further, research by Center for Ecological Sciences, IISc, reveals a 76% decline in vegetation cover and a 79% decline in water bodies due to the increase in built up space in the urban areas of Bengaluru. This implies that any further significant net addition within the urban area will result in a decline in standard of living.
How Bengaluru builds its infrastructure & manages this growth will determine if it will continue to lead in taking the country forward or it will become a failure leading to urban chaos.
Growth Center paradigm
CTTP 2007 commissioned by KUIFDC/IDD of GoK had this to say regarding Commuter Rail on existing tracks “With the development of the huge Multiple Economic Activity Areas like Electronic City, I.T. Parks, Industrial & Commercial Areas with consequent job opportunities on the one hand and availability of comparatively cheaper accommodation in surrounding towns like Hosur, Ramanagaram and Tumkur etc. where a large number of working population is likely to live, substantial of commuter movement between these towns and the Metropolis will take place.”
One critical element of this urban operating model of the future is how cities will make and enforce land & space choices. Housing has already become unaffordable in Bengaluru for the lower and middle classes. No city in India has allocated space and zoning for affordable housing. The housing market has a preference to locate close to commercial/urban spaces to increase the premium the houses can fetch. This increases both, the cost & mixed use urban sprawl. Counter magnet cities, with suburban mass transit, is the best and most effective way to focus on affordable housing for middle & lower income groups who will constitute 75% of the future workforce. Nearby suburban towns were often viewed as best options for setting up industries to release growth pressures on the city to absorb new migrants and to relocate some people from the city. It never happened, because a business ecosystem cannot be artificially replaced or relocated. These suburban cities need to be zoned to take the housing pressure off Bengaluru and this can happen only when the option of traveling to Bengaluru quickly and cheaply becomes a reality.
From the McKinsey report one can gather that, for the first time in India’s history, Karnataka along with other large south Indian states will have more people in its cities than in its villages. This means that the pressure on cities will increase considerably in the future to avoid urban sprawl and still manage their growth. Increasing the area of Bengaluru and making it Bruhat Bengaluru has put undue pressure on civic bodies and made the area difficult to manage. The alternate model is to enable suburban cities to become more attractive destinations for settlers & connect them via mass transit trains to within an approximate one hour commute distance from Bengaluru.
In the past two decades the state government in co-operation with the central government has attempted a few options to address the urban transportation challenges. Namma Metro, Mono Rail, High Speed Rail to BIAL, rejuvenated BMTC service are all examples. While most of these focus on making commute within Bengaluru city easier, the suburban connect is what will bring dividends in the long run.
Efficiency in operations, more advanced levels of automation in signaling supplemented by close coordination with local authorities in implementing last mile solutions and superior interchange with metro is going to determine the success of the Commuter rail.
The rest of this report will provide recommendations to ensure that the Commuter Rail can be implemented successfully and be counted amongst the best in the world.
2. CRS - What and Where?
Commuter Rail Service
Objective: Train services connecting suburban growth centers within 1 hour travel distance to Bangalore consisting of disabled friendly airconditioned trains running on existing tracks doubled or quadrupled to ensure high frequency of greater than 20 trains per day between each source destination pair
The Railways vision 2020 plan had this to say about railways vision for suburban rail "Partnerships with State and City Authorities will be established to augment the infrastructure and manage suburban services under a single management. Both suburban and long-distance trains must also look smart and colourful, reflecting our belief in and commitment to ‘Change for a better tomorrow’"
CRS Historical journey
-
1983, Southern Railway team recommends 3 commuter rail lines, and a 58-km ring railway over a 25-year period.
-
1988, RITES transport study report, among other things & also improvements on commuter rail lines
- In 1993, the State established committee to look into mass rapid transit recommended the same circular railway put forward by Southern Railways in 1983
- 1998 – RITES does survey for Local Trains funded by World Bank
- 2003 – RITES completes survey for Local Trains for State Govt
- 2007 - RITES does survey for Local Trains for BMLTA/IDD department for CTTP2007 Bengaluru
- Jan 2008 – IDD agrees to fund for two Rakes DEMU services
- Nov 2009 – BMLTA assigns work to IDD to study Commuter Rail servicesconnecting all peripheral stations
- 14 Dec 2009 – SWR finally agrees to start few Local Trains to Anekal/Devanhallai, Kengeri as per the BMLTA meeting
- Dec 2009 – MoS Shri K H Muniyappa makes press briefing that State Govt is not yet decided on Local Trains / Commuter Rail Services
- 2 Jan 2010 – MoS Shri K H Muniyappa makes announcement starting of Local Trains between Yeshwanthpur to Anekal and Devanahalli
- Feb 2010 – Bengaluru South MP Shri H N Ananth Kumar request the MoS Railways to take up the Local Train facility similar to Mumbai
- 3 Mar 2010 – CM of Karnataka Shri Yeddyurappa writes letter to Railway Minister to sanction the Local Train Project with 50% project cost to be contributed by State Govt.
After 27 years Bengaluru is still waiting for a full fledged commuter rail service
CTTP Map
2.1 Target growth centers for Commuter Rail
2.1.1. Hosur: Distance: 40kms; Population: >1.5 lakhs; Magnets: Anekal Pop:> 0.5 lakh, Electronic City Pop> 3 lakhs
2.1.2. Ramanagara: Distance: 50 kms; Population: >1 lakh; Magnets: Kengeri pop: >0.5 lakh
2.1.3 Tumkur: Distance: 70 kms; Population: > 30 lakhs; Magnets: Nelamangala pop: >0.5 lakh; Peenya & other industrial belts
2.1.4 Chickballapur: Distance: 70 kms; Population: > 0.7 lakh; Magnets: Devanahalli > 0.4 lakh: ITIR
2.1.5 Dodballapur: Distance: 40; Population: > 0.9 lakh; Magnets: Yelahanka > 3 lakhs: Dodballapur Indl area
2.1.6 Bangarpet: Distance: 90 kms; Population: > 0.5 lakh; Magnets: Whitefield, KIADB
2.2. Hubs
2.2.1 Yeswantpur - CRS West Hub
2.2.2 Byappanahalli (Benninganahalli) - CRS East Hub
2.2.3 Yelahanka - CRS North Hub
With trains from Yeswantpur towards Chickballapur & from Byappanahalli towards Dodballapur converging here Yelahanka is well positioned to be the CRS North hub. It serves major industrial regions of ITIR, DBP, BIA & Dodballapur. With a stop for HSRL also, this station needs to be developed into a multifunctional hub and taken up on the lines of Yeswantpur & Byappanahalli.
2.3. CRS Routes
2.3.1 Yeswantpur - Yelahanka - Devanahalli - Chickballapur
2.3.2 Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Jakkur - Yelahanka - Doddballapur
2.3.3 Yeswantpur - Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Anekal - Hosur
2.3.4 Tumkur/Nelamangala - Yeswantpur - Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli)
2.3.5 Yeswantpur/Yelahanka - Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Whitefield - Malur - Bangarpet
2.3.6 Yelahanka - Yeshwantpur - NICE PRR/City - Kengeri - Ramanagara
2.4. Commuter Rail Segments
2.4.1 Yeswantpur to Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) segment
Station |
Catchment Wards/Area |
Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur |
17 |
35 |
|
37 |
36 |
|
42 |
26 |
|
44 |
34 |
Lottegolahalli |
36 |
36 |
|
18 |
26 |
|
35 |
30 |
Hebbal |
19 |
24 |
|
20 |
26 |
|
21 |
24 |
|
8 |
22 |
Banaswadi |
49 |
32 |
|
59 |
36 |
|
28 |
35 |
Total Coverage |
|
422 |
No Station |
22 |
26 |
|
23 |
35 |
|
32 |
27 |
|
30 |
35 |
|
60 |
35 |
|
50 |
32 |
|
56 |
29 |
|
57 |
30 |
Total Uncovered |
|
249 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 6.71 lakh people 37.1% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations:
- Gokula Extension/Badappa Gardens
- ORR/D Rajagopal Rd Junction
- Guddadahalli
- Kanakanagar
- Irshad Nagar/HBR Layout
- Kadugondhalli
2.4.2 Byappanahalli to Hosur
Station |
Catchment Wards/Area |
Population in ,000 |
Bellandur |
149 |
25 |
Karmelrama |
150 |
20 |
|
Sarjapur |
20 |
Heelalige |
Bommasandra |
20 |
Anekal road |
Anekal+Jigani+Attibele |
200 |
Hosur |
Hosur |
200 |
Total Coverage |
|
485 |
No Station |
81 |
25 |
|
85 |
22 |
|
86 |
23 |
Total Uncovered |
|
70 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 5.55 lakh people 12.6% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- Angel Arcade/Kagagadasapuram
- ORR Jn @ Karthik Nagar
- Varthur Rd Junction / Chinnapanahalli
- Chandapur
2.4.3 Byappanahalli to Yelahanka segment
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Baiyappanhalli | 50 | 31 |
Channasandra | 26 | 22 |
Yelahanka | 4 | 25 |
Total Coverage | 78 | |
No Station | Horamavu | 28 |
Hennur- Bagalur Rd | 25 | |
Thanisandra Rd | 25 | |
Jakkur | 15 | |
NH7 Junction @ Nehru Nagar | 10 | |
Total Not Covered | 103 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 1.81 lakh people 56.9% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- Horamavu
- Hennur - Bagalur Rd
- Thanisandra Main Road / Narayanpura
- Jakkur
- Nehru Nagar / NH-7 Junction
2.4.4 Yeshwantpur to Yelahanka Segment
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur | 37 | 35 |
Lottegollahalli | 8 | 10 |
Kodigehalli | 9 | 12 |
Yelahanka | 10 | |
Total Coverage | 67 | |
No Station | Gokula Extension (36) | 35 |
BEL /Devi Nagar | 10 | |
Tata Nagar | 10 | |
CQAL Layout | 10 | |
L & T /ALLalsandra Mn Rd | 10 | |
Jakkur | 40 | |
Yelahanka Tn (3, 4) | 49 | |
Total Not Covered | 164 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 2.31 lakh people 70% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- Gokula Extension
- BEL /Devi Nagar
- Tata Nagar
- CQAL Layout
- L & T /ALLalsandra Mn Rd
- Jakkur
- Yelahanka Town
2.4.5 Yelahanka to Dodballapur
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yelahanka | 3, 4 | 50 |
Rajankunte | 10 | |
Doddaballapur | 70 | |
Total Coverage | 130 | |
No Station | ||
Yelahanka Tn | 10 | |
Kanchanhalli | 20 | |
Naganahalli | 10 | |
Harohalli | 25 | |
Puttenhalli | 15 | |
Total Not Covered | 80 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 2.1 lakh people 38.2% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- Kenchanhalli
- Naganahalli / Harohalli
- Putenhalli
- Doddaballapur Industrial Town
2.4.6 Yelahanka to Chickballapur
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yelahanka | 3, 4 | 49 |
Bettahalsoor | Sonnapanhalli, MVIT, Ganganahalli | 20 |
Daddajala | 10 | |
Devenahalli | 78 | |
Avati | 37 | |
Venkatgiri Kote | 10 | |
Nandi Hills | 10 | |
Chik Ballapur | 62 | |
Total Coverage | 276 | |
No Station | ||
Yelahanka Tn | 10 | |
Kanchanhalli | 20 | |
Doddasandra | 10 | |
BIAL | 25 | |
MVIT, Sonappanhalli, Ganganahalli | 15 | |
Total Not Covered | 80 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 2.76 lakh people 28.9% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- Kenchanhalli
- NITTE Meenakshi Institute of Technology
- MVIT / Ganganahalli
- NH-7/BIAL trumpet
- IVC Road
- SJCIT (Chikballapur)
2.4.7 Yeswantpur to Tumkur segment
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur | 37, 45, 36, 17 | 141 |
Chik Banavara | 164 | |
Soldevanahalli | 5 | |
Golhalli | 74 | |
Bhairanayakanhalli | 5 | |
Dodbele | 5 | |
Muddalingahalli | 5 | |
Nidvanda | 5 | |
Dobbspet | 25 | |
Hirehalli | 5 | |
Kyatsandra | 162 | |
Tumkur | 248 | |
Total Coverage | 844 | |
No Station | 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 | 162 |
41 | 27 | |
Tarabandahalli | 10 | |
Hesrghatta | 5 | |
Nelamangala Cross | 10 | |
Thayamogundlu | 10 | |
Total Not Covered | 224 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 10.68 lakh people 20.97% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- ORR Junction at Peenya/Jalahalli
- HMT Main Road Junction
- Jalahalli Road
- Kammgondahalli
- Chikkasandra
- Hesarghatta Road /Tarabandahalli
- Shreyas Arcade
- NH207 Junction
- Dobbspet
- Siddaganga Institute of Technology
2.4.8 Yeswantpur to Ramanagaram segment
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur | 37, 44, 36 | 104 |
Malleswaram | 45,66 | 70 |
Bangalore City | 120, 121 | 70 |
Nayandhalli | 22 | |
Jnana Bharati (BU) | 25 | |
Kengeri | 42 | |
Hejjala | 22 | |
Bidadi | 50 | |
Ketohalli | 12 | |
Ramanagaram | 80 | |
Total Coverage | 497 | |
No Station | RVCE/Duvasapalya | 40 |
NICE Rd Intersection | 25 | |
Country Club | 20 | |
Humpa Pura/RK Estates | 10 | |
Kumbalgodu | 10 | |
Ghousia College | 15 | |
Total Not Covered | 120 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 6.12 lakh people 24.96% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- Subramanyam Nagar
- Srirampura
- Binnypet
- RPC layout
- Basaveshwara Park / Chord Road
- Deepanjali Metro Station
- Sports Authority of India
- Rajarajeswari Dental College
- Humpapur / Rakumar Estate
- Ghousia College of Engineering
2.4.9 Baiyappanhalli to Malur/Bangarapet segment
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 | |
Baiyappanhalli | 50, 58 | 66 | |
K R Puram | 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 | 120 | |
Whitefield | 83, 84, 85 | 69 | |
Malur | 27 | ||
Byatrayanhalli | 10 | ||
Tekal | 10 | ||
Bangarapet | 40 | ||
Total Coverage | 342 | ||
No Station | Garudachar Palya | 20 | |
Kadugodi | 22 | ||
NH 207 Junction | 10 | ||
Tarabhalli | 10 | ||
SH 95 Junction | 5 | ||
Total Not Covered | 67 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 4 lakh people 16% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Proposed additional stations
- ITI Industrial Area
- Hoodi Main Road
- Kdigehalli
- NH-207
- Tarabhalli
- Malur KIADB
3 Proposition
3.1 Phase 1
3.1.1 Setup of SPV (3 months)
Thus it is highly recommended that the Suburban CRS be run under an SPV called Commuter Rail Authority (CRA) which will consist at a bare minimum the following stake holders
- SWR representing IR
- IDD representing GoK
- BMTC representing last mile
- BMRC representing metro integration
It is important the the SPV be setup first so the implementation can be done in an organized fashion. Without this each decision will be made in a disjointed fashion leading to delays in implementation and unsatisfactory end results
In 2007, the Rail India Technical and Economic Society (RITES), a Government of India enterprise, brought out a Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Plan (CTTP) for Bangalore. The report states that “Major developments have been proposed in the suburban towns of Bangalore by BMRDA in the BMR. This is likely to increase interaction betweenBangalore and these suburban towns. There will be need to provide commuter rail services to these towns fromBangalore”. It also says that the commuter rail system should be extended up to BMRDA’s new townships and beyond to act as sub-urban services.
It also goes on to state “In the suburban segment, the main challenges are the creation of adequate capacity, segregation of commuter lines from long-distance lines and expansion of services to ensure comfort of commuters. Partnership with state authorities will be necessary for development of suburban rail systems. Railways may also aim at integrating the metro-rail and sub-urban rail-systems under a single management in partnership with the respective state/city authorities.”
3.1.2 Enhance accessibility to existing stations (3 months )
The railway vision plan 2020 says this on stations "However, the stations are inadequately designed and equipped to handle such large multitudes of passengers. They do not provide easy access or comfortable experience prior to boarding or after disembarkation from trains. Street-level access is generally restricted to one or two end-platforms (except at terminal type of station layouts). Inter-platform connectivity is through foot over-bridges which are often inadequate, apart from being passenger-unfriendly"
- Supporting infrastructure for the Feeder Service BMTC - Proper Bus Stop, Info panels
- Preferential Access Point for Public Transport Drop Off/Pick up - Taxis, Cabs, Auto
- Preferential Parking Spaces for Environmental Friendly Vehicles like Bicycles
- General Security 24/7 around station and access roads
3.1.3 Last mile connectivity (3 months)
Rolling Stock features
It is very important that in order to make Commuter Rail useful and viable, it has to have the tight integration with city’s PT systems. Integration with other PT systems provides the commuter with point to point connectivity right from the town outside
Bengaluru to the specific location in the city. The Integration could range from Commuter Rail station at the same physical location to Commuter Rail station being little walking distance to other PT transit stations. Carriages having facilities
to carry cycles will go a long way in helping promote green last mile options. It also benefits the economically weaker
sections to save on the total cost of commuting
BMTC Connection
The lack of a proper last mile connectivity has been a major reason for failure of usage of CRS in many cities. BMTC needs to support CRS by providing the feeder service to all the CRS stops/stations in the BMTC operational area. The feeder service at bare minimum should connect the CRS stations to the nearest BMTC transit center. Looking at BMTC footprint this should be easy proposition. All it may require is some change in the route or could be an exclusive feeder loop connecting the station and the nearest transit center. Acceptance of Common Fare Card for easy transfer would be highly required and beneficial to all.
3.1.4 Upgrade stations (Smart Stations) to have common branding & facilities (3 months)
Common branding enables common facilities to be offered under single roof. It is administratively easier to provide information and services. This requires the current SWR services to destinations in the commuter rail target list also to be
rolled into the ambit of commuter rail. SWR trains to destinations like Bangarpet, Hosur and nearby towns can become Commuter rail services thus enabling common ticketing schemes and timetable sharing. This inorganic acquisition of existing services will help scale the Commuter Rail services faster.
Information Systems
- Electronic Information Displays - Announcing Arrivals/Departures
- Electronic / Manual Information Counter - Information on nearest transit centers, Business Centers, Hotels/Restaurants etc,
Fare Tickets / Smart Cards
The Railways vision plan also mentions "Distribution channels for railway tickets would be constantly innovated so that obtaining a railway ticket is completely hassle-free. PRS/UTS terminals, e-ticket services, tickets through post offices, ATMs, petrol pumps and smart-card based tickets for unreserved travel would be expanded to improve access. New and emerging technologies will be harnessed towards this end"
- Fare Tickets/Smart Cards Vending Kiosks (Self Service)
- Fare Tickets/Smart Cards Vending Counters (Manned)
Common ticketing system between CRS, Metro & BMTC must be formed
Basic Commuter Amenities
Availability of basic commuter amenities is a must for the success of the Commuter Rail and increased patronage. Below listed are these basic commuter amenities:
- CRS Travel Information/Planning Kiosks
- Customer Service - Telephone/Manned
- Clean and Hygienically maintained Restrooms
- Internet Hot-Spots
- Charging outlets for mobile devices
- First Aid Counter
- ATM / Postal Vending Kiosks
- Help for Physically Handicapped, Senior Citizens, Women with Children
Bulk Goods Transportation Facilities
The towns located around Bengaluru city are the growth centers and Commuter Rail is their smart life line for their regular commute, business trips, goods transport from and to their towns. CR can facilitate the goods transportation by having rakes for carrying bulk goods and products. One good example is seen in Mumbai's local service, where each train has a special bogey exclusively for carrying bulk goods.
3.1.5 Optimized routing of existing SWR services to create bandwidth (6 months)
Following trains which are currently running as slow/passenger trains needs to be brought into the ambit of CR.
Following Trains to be completely converted into EMU coaches on Bangalore to Bangarapet for Commutre Rail | ||||||||
1 | 526SW | Bangalore City | 7:00 | Marikuppam | 9:35 | Passenger | Starting | Only 16 Kms extra & 5 more stations exists |
102SW | Bangalore City | 9:20 | Bangarapet junction | 11:00 | Passenger | This train is SBC- Arakkonam Junction | ||
2 | 530SW | Bangalore City | 10:00 | Bangarapet junction | 12:05 | Passenger | Pair for 529SW, wasting 20 minites at Bangalore city | |
3 | 511SW | Bangalore City | 12:20 | Marikuppam | 15:15 | Passenger | Pair for 512SW, wasting 100 minites at Bangalore city | |
4 | 532SW | Bangalore City | 14:45 | Bangarapet junction | 16:25 | Passenger | Pair for 531SW, wasting 15 minites at Bangalore city | |
5 | 503SW | Bangalore Cantt. | 15:00 | Bangarapet junction | 17:05 | Passenger | ||
6 | 524SW | Bangalore City | 18:05 | Marikuppam | 20:35 | Passenger | Pair for 525SW, wasting 15 minites at Bangalore city | |
7 | 6522 | Bangalore City | 19:35 | Bangarapet junction | 21:10 | Express | ||
8 | 523SW | Marikuppam | 6:20 | Bangalore City | 9:15 | Passenger | Starting | |
9 | 529SW | Bangarapet junction | 7:30 | Bangalore City | 9:30 | Passenger | Starting | |
10 | 512SW | Marikuppam | 8:00 | Bangalore City | 10:30 | Passenger | Starting | |
11 | 502SW | Bangarapet junction | 11:00 | Bangalore Cantt. | 13:00 | Passenger | ||
12 | 531SW | Bangarapet junction | 12:40 | Bangalore City | 14:25 | Passenger | Pair for 530SW, wasting 30 minites at Bangarpet Jn | |
13 | 525SW | Marikuppam | 14:00 | Bangalore City | 17:00 | Passenger | ||
101SW | Bangarapet junction | 16:30 | Bangalore City | 18:45 | Passenger | This train is Arakkonam Junction - SBC | ||
14 | 6521 | Bangarapet junction | 21:40 | Bangalore City | 23:25 | Express | Pair for 6522, wasting 20 minites at Bangarpet Jn | |
Total 7 + 1 pair of Passanger trains & one express Trains running between Bangalore city to Bangarpet excluding Arakkonam can be converted into Commuter Rail | ||||||||
Following Trains need to be convereted into Commtre Rail once Electrification of Tracks completed ( after 6 months ) | ||||||||
1 | 551SW | Bangalore City | 8:40 | Chikballapur | 10:50 | Passenger | ||
2 | 595Sw | Bangalore City | 18:00 | Chikballapur | 19:55 | Passenger | ||
3 | 596SW | Chikballapur | 7:55 | Bangalore City | 9:45 | Passenger | ||
4 | 552SW | Chikballapur | 15:55 | Bangalore City | 18:00 | Passenger | ||
5 | YH-1 | Yesvanthpur | 6:20 | Hosur | 7:55 | Passenger | ||
6 | YH-2 | Yesvanthpur | 15:35 | Hosur | 17:05 | Passenger | ||
7 | YD-1 | Yesvanthpur | 10:40 | Devanhallai | 11:45 | Passenger | ||
8 | HY-1 | Hosur | 8:10 | Yesvanthpur | 9:50 | Passenger | ||
9 | HY-2 | Hosur | 17:45 | Yesvanthpur | 19:20 | Passenger | ||
10 | DY-1 | Devanhallai | 13:15 | Yesvanthpur | 14:35 | Passenger | ||
11 | 221Sw | Bangalore City | 9:20 | Tumkur | 11:05 | Passenger | ||
12 | 225SW | Bangalore City | 13:35 | Tumkur | 15:25 | Passenger | ||
13 | 226SW | Tumkur | 15:50 | Bangalore City | 17:40 | Passenger | ||
14 | 222SW | Tumkur | 11:25 | Bangalore City | 13:15 | Passenger | ||
Another 7 Pair of Trains tol be converted into EMU Rakes after electrification of Tracks and to be added into Commuter Rail | ||||||||
Effectively existing 14 pair of Trains should be running as Commuter Rail within 6-12 months and more services to be introduced by utilizing the capacity of Traks and Rakes. | ||||||||
We can have Fast Commuter Rail similar to SBC - Bangarpet |
3.1.6 New services on identified routes including creating last mile connectivity (6 months)
3.1.7 Increase frequency on all routes to minimum 8 services in a day (6 months)
3.2 Phase 2
3.2.1 New signaling system (12 months)
3.2.2 New identified stations on all routes (18 months)
New Stations are listed in the section 2.4.1 to 2.4.9
3.2.3 Doubling & Electrification of tracks as necessary (18 months)
Sr No | Segment | Distance in Kms | Doubling Needed | Electrification Needed | Status / Remarks | |
1 | Yelahanka to Yesavnthpur | 12.45 | Yes | Done | Already Railway Budget Sanctioned, DPR is ready, Tenders to be called | |
2 | Yelahanka to K R Puram | 15.80 | Yes | Done | Already Railway Budget Sanctioned, DPR is ready, Tenders to be called | |
3 | Yelahanka to Chikballapur | 46.05 | Yes | Yes | ||
4 | Yelahanka to Dodballapur | 20.72 | Yes | Yes | ||
5 | Yesavnthpur to Banaswadi | 14.76 | Yes | Done | ||
6 | Banaswadi to Hosur | 51.36 | Yes | Yes | ||
7 | Banswadi to Baiyyappanahalli | 4.47 | Yes | Done | ||
8 | Yesvanthpur to Soldevanhalli | 10.78 | No | Yes | ||
9 | Soladevanhalli to Nelamngala & upto NH-4 | 8.00 / 10.00 | Yes | Yes | ||
10 | Soladevanhalli to Tumkur | 53.22 | No | Yes | ||
11 | Kengeri to Ramanagaram | 32.43 | No | Yes | As part of Bangalore to Mysore Doubling & Electrification, this streach electrification will be done at time. | Need to check current status of electrification |
270.04 | ||||||
From the above Double Track Exists : | 96.43 Kms | |||||
From the above Electrified Track exists : | 47.48 Kms | |||||
Total Track Doubling Needed : | 173.61 Kms | |||||
Electrification Needed : | 222.56 Kms | To check Electrification for 32.43 Kms of Kengeri to Ramangaram | ||||
In the above Yelahanka to Yesavnthpur, Yelahanka to K R Puram, Yesvanthpur to Banaswadi Doubling of Track Dist : 43 Kms are very critical for Commuter Rail take off. |
3.2.5 Increase frequency to 20 trains per day on all routes (24 months)
3.2.6 Enhance Hubs to handle increased traffic (24 months )
3.2.7 Complete integration with all modes of PT systems including metro/mono/HSRL (24 months) 7 Smart Public Transport Connections
All over the world, the trend in public transport system is to integrate all modes of PT systems. Gone are the days when each one of them operated in complete isolation. In India also this integration philosophy is slowly picking up steam though have long way to go.
It is very important that in order to make CRS useful and viable, it has to have the tight integration with city’s PT systems. Integration with other PT systems provides the commuter with point to point connectivity right from the town outside Bengaluru to the specific location in the city.
The Integration could range from CRS station at the same physical location to CRS station being little walking distance to other PT transit stations. Simple access connectivity connectivity can be like this.
Metro Connection
Fortunately Namma Metro intersects the IR routes at many places in the city. CRS simply needs to integrate with Namma Metro at these locations, i.e provide easy interchange. Some of the locations that can provide easy transit include:
- Yeshwantpur
- Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli)
- Kengeri
- Whitefield
HSRL Connection
Exclusive connectivity to the new airport via high speed rail as an when becomes operational also provides the opportunity for CRS to integrate with HSRL thereby providing the commuters from the nearby towns another PT connection to reach the new airport and vice versa. Interchange with HSRL needs to be provided at both Yelahanka and Hebbal.
Summary
35 new proposed stations
160 is the possible number of services per day on all routes suggested for optimum efficiency
376 Kilometers is the approximate distance covered by the proposed routes
1,50,000 is the carrying capacity per day which can be increased by adding rakes
45,00,000 is the number of people in the catchment areas covered by the current SWR tracks
33% is the percentage of the population in the catchment areas who need access to a local station
2010 is the year for Commuter Rail in Bengaluru
SPV is the way to go for rolling out commuter services with all stakeholders being a part of this entity working together to make this a success
All images, trademarks, information used here have been gathered from the information made available in the public domain. All copyrights rest with the original authors. Praja.in does not vouch for the accuracy or veracity of the information collected from public sources and 3rd parties and not liable for any consequential effects of the usage of the same. |
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments
- Forward this Project Wiki
Praja.in comment guidelines
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!
User login
Recent comments in this project
Bangalore Public Transport
- BRTS, Bus Priority or similar concepts for Bangalore
- Bangalore Transportation: Research and Reports
- Bangalore CTTP 2007
- CTTP Bangalore Executive Summary
- Chapter–1 Introduction
- Chapter–2 Study Objectives And Methodology
- Chapter–3 Existing Traffic And Travel Characteristics
- Chapter–4 Development Of Operational Travel Demand Model
- Chapter–5 Strategy For Transport Development
- Chapter–6 Future Demand Analysis And System Selection
- Chapter–7 The Traffic And Transportation Plan
- 7.1 Components Of The Traffic And Transportation Plan
- 7.2 Mass Transport System
- 7.3 The Metro Network System
- 7.4 Mono Rail / Light Rapid Transit System (LRT)
- 7.5 Commuter Rail System
- 7.6 BRT System
- 7.7 Augmentation And Improvement In City Bus System
- 7.8 Integrated Multi Modal Transit Centres –Cum- Intercity Bus Terminals
- 7.9 Road Infrastructure
- 7.10 Inter-Modal Interchanges
- 7.11 Non- Motorized Modes
- 7.12 Parking
- 7.13 Freight Movement
- 7.14 Demand Control
- 7.15 Transport System Management - B-TRAC 2010
- Chapter–8 Transport Integration
- Chapter–9 Cost Estimates, Phasing And Financing Plan
- Chapter–10 Institutional Development
- Bangalore Mass Transit - Summary of Past Study Reports
- CCTF Report
- Traffic/Transport Issues & CTTP-2007
- CTTP Review – Further Comments & Inputs
- CTTP review comments
- Part I: BRTS
- Part I: Monorail
- Part I: Airport Rail Link - The Monorail Option
- Part I: Commuter Rail System
- Part II: Non-Motorised User Facilities
- Part II: Traffic Restraining Measures
- Part III: South East CBD areas not connected
- Part III: ITPL and surrounding areas not covered
- Bangalore CTTP 2007
- Bangalore bus system
- BMTC Routing
- Ask Me service - Query on BMTC routes
- BMTC - Interactive Maps Project
- BMTC route allottment - sheet attached
- Case Study: Taking the Bus
- Routes introduced after February 2010
- The Big10 routing concept
- BIG10, KSOL, KSBL - Route Details
- BMTC - S1 Route (Vijayanagar to Vijayanagar)
- BMTC Big 10 and HOHO service: work in progess?
- Bellary Road Big 10
- Big10 - 5 things to build upon BMTC's direction-based rework
- Big10 concept - Circle Routes are here?
- Extend or overlap BIG 10 services
- HOHO off to a slow start
- My experiment with the Sarjapura road Big10
- Tried office commute using Big10 - a report
- BMTC and Corruption
- BMTC and monopoly - opening up Local Bus Transport in Bangalore
- BPS Concept Paper
- First and Last Mile connects for BMTC
- Feeder Routes as 'Branded' Service
- BMTC's encouraging mini bus talk - good going Mr Parwez
- Feeder Bus Service - Malleswaram Example
- Minibuses for better area coverage
- No bus connecvitity from Kaggadasapura, Vignana Nagar to HAL airport Road!!
- Shuttle suggestions based on our experiences
- Feeder Bus Routes for Areas East of Suranjandas Rd
- Information Available on BMTC
- Vajra/Volvos doing well
- BMTC Routing
- Commuter Rail Service
- CRS Bangalore: A project that never gets the green
- CRS for Bangalore
- Commuter / suburban rail - part II
- Commuter Rail - Will it ever materialize ?
- Commuter Rail - Will it really help ?
- Commuter Rail System - for us?
- Commuter Rail can make our city better
- Commuter rail for Bengaluru - state not interested?
- Commuter rail to E-City may happen soon!
- DRM's presentation (regarding Commuter Rail etc)
- Edge stations, ring rail, and leasing or acquiring SWR assets
- Imagine Sarjapur suburb area, with Commuter Rail
- Nayandahalli Station Should Be Improved
- Report - Bangalore local train ride & meet
- South Western Railway - please wake up and listen to us!
- Tale of Hebbal station
- Updates from the Railway Minister
- Using the present Indian railways as Commuter rail in Bangalore
- Transportation Solutions for Bangalore
- Economical Transportation Solutions for Sustainable Bangalore
- External Links (related work)
- Metro Rail too much to handle - Can we leapfrog...
- PIL - To Sort out the Transport Mess
- Tax Sops to encourage use of Public transport (BMTC) ?
- Urban Transportation reforms around the BMLTA concept
- Bengaluru Light Rail
Comments
Doubt if this will convince
Any recent updates on usage stats available for the suburban services in operation (ie. to Devanahalli & Hosur) ? They were in small percentages of available capacity (about a month ago). With this reality, it would be hard to justify CRS for suburban use as the main goal, despite possible future scenarios detailed in the McKinsey report, & particularly when histories in all other cities do not support the theory.
As reference, CTTP had detailed flwg CRS routes in phase-1: Kengeri-Banglore City Station (13.0km); Kengeri-BMA Boundary (9.0km); Bangalore City Station-Whitefield (24.0km); & BMA Boundary-Ramanagaram (23.0km).
The Metro (in ph-2) is proposed to be extended to run up to Kengeri. Thus, the case for CRS to Kengeri becomes weak. The only suburban service (ie. skip-stop services) that remains out of those recommended by CTTP ph-1 is to Ramnagaram (others were urban to supplement the Metro).
The total route length being proposed here is in excess of 750km (including a new line) - all in about 5 years - nearly four times the 204km recommended by CTTP till 2025 !
I think if the vision for CRS is centered principally as a service for suburban commuting needs to build up the case ("not the Metro for Bangalore"), it might not find takers & runs the risk of being ignored by IDD /SWR.
I feel it would be more realistic to choose the many urban segments (those not going to be covered by Metro or Mono) & build up a case for them first instead of going all out for suburban services to so many far flung towns & areas in several directions (This explains why patronage is so poor on operational routes - they run the risk of a rollback with suspension). I think once these short urban services have stabilized, routes should be gradually extended to peripheries & suburbs.
I think the principal goal is
diluting the potential objectives for CRS with this assumption
It is not an assumption. It is a goal. The main goal of commuter rail.
I think the principal goal is of course to reduce loads on the roads of Bangalore urban
No the vision is larger, this is not the metro for Bangalore this is the commuter rail for the suburbs, see overview
even for those that use Metro (or Mono) - they could use CRS to reach destinations not serviced by Metro /Mono
Yes and it does not conflict with the objective I have stated
Suburban use of CRS can only be an "added attraction"
There is no metro for suburban use hence this is the main attraction. The Bangalore of tomorrow cannot exist without this suburban connection. It will disintegrate on the load.
The reason is not difficult to fathom - difficult access to stations, poor frequency & severe limitations for pickup & dropoff points.
All have been mentioned in the report
As it is, they are reluctant to improve /double the tracks or build new stations
SPV is needed to bring this focus.
justifying the need for an SPV
It is already agreed to by IR in their Vision 2020 document. We are only emphasising the urgency & structure. Time for them to put their money where their mouth is.
More to CRS than just Suburban
Went through the attachments - eight of them (any more ?). The 'meat' for the proposal is all in there, no doubt, but still a lot more needs to be done, I guess. No clear maps yet, except for a rough pdf sketch. I think bringing up short-term inconveniences such as Metro /fly-over construction also as reasons to justify CRS might only prove counter-productive - some overlap of points (mentioned more than once) & phrasing could be improved too.
Further, you are diluting the potential objectives for CRS with this assumption :
has a goal different from Metro or Mono. It is to help people live in the growth centers where housing is relatively cheaper and still be able to commute to the city.
I think the principal goal is of course to reduce loads on the roads of Bangalore urban, whilst fast /efficient transport to areas not serviced by Metro /Mono would be the second objective even for those that use Metro (or Mono) - they could use CRS to reach destinations not serviced by Metro /Mono. It is for this reason that it is very necessary to pinpoint where exactly new CRS stations should be located to provide interchanges.
Noticed that you mentioned about smart cards for common ticketing: all the more reason why inter-change stations need to be marked on a clear map that suggests how easily this could be done. Suburban use of CRS can only be an "added attraction" - we saw how few people there were on our train ride to Hosur. The reason is not difficult to fathom - difficult access to stations, poor frequency & severe limitations for pickup & dropoff points.
For starters, I don't think the proposal for an entirely new line (between Yeswantapur & Kengeri) will have support from either SWR or IDD. As it is, they are reluctant to improve /double the tracks or build new stations - since the assumption is that the project will lose money (similar to all other CRS in the country).
Thus, the package to provide would have to be a convincing one from the point of view of increasing patronization levels - & justifying the need for an SPV or some such entity to run services since there could never be enough thrust from SWR since they will be governed by IR which is sold to the idea that CRS like operations can never be made successful (the way they run it would never see success!).
feel that unless ideas &
feel that unless ideas & suggestions that include addressing urban commuters' needs & possibilities
The proposal adresses all needs of commuters living in the SWR track catchment area. Everybody else has access to metro or mono or BMTC or anything else that may be built for Bangalore city. Commuter Rail has a goal different from Metro or Mono. It is to help people live in the growth centers where housing is relatively cheaper and still be able to commute to the city.
I think the proposal must include a plan for many new urban stations
Its already in there (right now TBD), the new stations are in one of the attachments in this project, Sanjeev is helping Syed place them in the appropriate segments. You can take a look at them and let us know if any station is missed.
There is no proposal for a line between Yelahanka & Kengeri
The report proposes a line (dotted red) which bypasses the city, can be laid on either the PRR or along NICE road and join Tumkur line directly to Yeshwantpur. Until this new line comes up the only way to reach Yeshwantpur from Ramanagara is via the city.
CRS plan - include urban stations
CRS plan - include urban stations
Lot of ward data has been quoted after quite some referencing, but I'm not entirely certain this would be sufficient to convince SWR /IDD about the need for dedicated /frequent services along the routes proposed without detailing ideas for urban stations & access.
I feel that unless ideas & suggestions that include addressing urban commuters' needs & possibilities, the authorities might not bite & SWR can turn around & say that they are already operating suficient services based on demand, & that if & when demand increases, they would scale up accordingly.
In this context, I think the proposal must include a plan for many new urban stations such as the ones previously discussed that must be easy & convenient for commuters as well as for BMTC to reach & run buses to (or be close to Metro /Mono stations).
There is no proposal for a line between Yelahanka & Kengeri. The new lines planned are between Kengeri & Chamarajanagar (via Kanakapura), & between Chikbanavar & Hassan (via Kunigal) - as per SWR map.
Pls advise what help is reqd - I can do some work in my spare time !
Need help with a schematic
Need help with a schematic map for the CRS routes. Any volunteers? TIA
Change in the route
IDS,
As discussed on the route / destinations, I feel we need to make following changes :
2.3.2 Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Jakkur - Yelahanka - Doddballapur
This should start from Hosur -Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Jakkur - Yelahanka - Doddballapur as from Hosure we have only segment to Yesvanthpur
Add the one more route as : 2.3.7 Nelamangala - Yeswantpur - Kengeri - Bidadi,
Sanjeev
CRS Wiki has been updated with lot of MEAT!
IDS, Sanjeev,
CRS wiki has been updated with all the route/stations list along with catchments areas and their population. I think it has all the basic information one would look for. I would suggest that the Wiki content to be reviewed thoroughly and made into a PRAJA demand report ASAP. As SB suggested we should shoot for June 15 for the 1st formal version and setup the meeting accordingly.
If IDD requests for more detailed information, we could hire somebody to do the detailed report for next round of meetings/seminar.
BTW, is the Wed meet ON?
Syed
CRS wiki has been updated with proposed route info!
IDS,
Route/Station for YPR-CBP, YPR-DPR and BYP-CBP has been added. I think it is time we collate all the wiki info into a nice report.
Syed
@SB - The approach is to connect the nearby towns
SB,
IDS and myself are trying to project demand for CRS as the connecting nearby towns to B'lore.Not extending B'lore to these towns.
Message being CRS is the way to provide reliable, low cost connectivity to help people travel from these towns and vice-versa for jobs, business, transporting agri products and industrial products.
Hope this would find resonance with IDD, SWR and GOK.
Syed
Good going, esp the ward based approach
Looked at the structure. Great going. Ward and destination based approach with catchment data estimate should make for a niced presentation than only talking routes and possibilities in english.
Just like you have done in this outline (in the wiki above) I'd say that for now, let us keep 100% clear of how GoK, Railways etc need to work together and things like that. That is next step, and is anyway an area where Madhu and SWR DRM will know a lot more (jurisdiction complexities, acts that need to be touched etc etc) than what we could tell them.
Wiki update
Need some help with the additional station list and existing station list to be populated in the appropriate segments.