Per McKinsey report on India’s urbanization to 2030:
Bengaluru is a leader in this growth. Per the report, it will have more than 10 million people inhabiting it by 2030, of whom; a majority will be from the middle and lower income group. For them, the urban mobility challenge will only increase as the working population increases and hence, commute will become a major quality of life indicator.
Further, research by Center for Ecological Sciences, IISc, reveals a 76% decline in vegetation cover and a 79% decline in water bodies due to the increase in built up space in the urban areas of Bengaluru. This implies that any further significant net addition within the urban area will result in a decline in standard of living.
How Bengaluru builds its infrastructure & manages this growth will determine if it will continue to lead in taking the country forward or it will become a failure leading to urban chaos.
Growth Center paradigm
CTTP 2007 commissioned by KUIFDC/IDD of GoK had this to say regarding Commuter Rail on existing tracks “With the development of the huge Multiple Economic Activity Areas like Electronic City, I.T. Parks, Industrial & Commercial Areas with consequent job opportunities on the one hand and availability of comparatively cheaper accommodation in surrounding towns like Hosur, Ramanagaram and Tumkur etc. where a large number of working population is likely to live, substantial of commuter movement between these towns and the Metropolis will take place.”
One critical element of this urban operating model of the future is how cities will make and enforce land & space choices. Housing has already become unaffordable in Bengaluru for the lower and middle classes. No city in India has allocated space and zoning for affordable housing. The housing market has a preference to locate close to commercial/urban spaces to increase the premium the houses can fetch. This increases both, the cost & mixed use urban sprawl. Counter magnet cities, with suburban mass transit, is the best and most effective way to focus on affordable housing for middle & lower income groups who will constitute 75% of the future workforce. Nearby suburban towns were often viewed as best options for setting up industries to release growth pressures on the city to absorb new migrants and to relocate some people from the city. It never happened, because a business ecosystem cannot be artificially replaced or relocated. These suburban cities need to be zoned to take the housing pressure off Bengaluru and this can happen only when the option of traveling to Bengaluru quickly and cheaply becomes a reality.
From the McKinsey report one can gather that, for the first time in India’s history, Karnataka along with other large south Indian states will have more people in its cities than in its villages. This means that the pressure on cities will increase considerably in the future to avoid urban sprawl and still manage their growth. Increasing the area of Bengaluru and making it Bruhat Bengaluru has put undue pressure on civic bodies and made the area difficult to manage. The alternate model is to enable suburban cities to become more attractive destinations for settlers & connect them via mass transit trains to within an approximate one hour commute distance from Bengaluru.
In the past two decades the state government in co-operation with the central government has attempted a few options to address the urban transportation challenges. Namma Metro, Mono Rail, High Speed Rail to BIAL, rejuvenated BMTC service are all examples. While most of these focus on making commute within Bengaluru city easier, the suburban connect is what will bring dividends in the long run.
Efficiency in operations, more advanced levels of automation in signaling supplemented by close coordination with local authorities in implementing last mile solutions and superior interchange with metro is going to determine the success of the Commuter rail.
The rest of this report will provide recommendations to ensure that the Commuter Rail can be implemented successfully and be counted amongst the best in the world.
Objective: Train services connecting suburban growth centers within 1 hour travel distance to Bangalore consisting of disabled friendly airconditioned trains running on existing tracks doubled or quadrupled to ensure high frequency of greater than 20 trains per day between each source destination pair
The Railways vision 2020 plan had this to say about railways vision for suburban rail "Partnerships with State and City Authorities will be established to augment the infrastructure and manage suburban services under a single management. Both suburban and long-distance trains must also look smart and colourful, reflecting our belief in and commitment to ‘Change for a better tomorrow’"
CRS Historical journey
1983, Southern Railway team recommends 3 commuter rail lines, and a 58-km ring railway over a 25-year period.
1988, RITES transport study report, among other things & also improvements on commuter rail lines
After 27 years Bengaluru is still waiting for a full fledged commuter rail service
CTTP Map
2.1.1. Hosur: Distance: 40kms; Population: >1.5 lakhs; Magnets: Anekal Pop:> 0.5 lakh, Electronic City Pop> 3 lakhs
2.1.2. Ramanagara: Distance: 50 kms; Population: >1 lakh; Magnets: Kengeri pop: >0.5 lakh
2.1.3 Tumkur: Distance: 70 kms; Population: > 30 lakhs; Magnets: Nelamangala pop: >0.5 lakh; Peenya & other industrial belts
2.1.4 Chickballapur: Distance: 70 kms; Population: > 0.7 lakh; Magnets: Devanahalli > 0.4 lakh: ITIR
2.1.5 Dodballapur: Distance: 40; Population: > 0.9 lakh; Magnets: Yelahanka > 3 lakhs: Dodballapur Indl area
2.1.6 Bangarpet: Distance: 90 kms; Population: > 0.5 lakh; Magnets: Whitefield, KIADB
2.2.1 Yeswantpur - CRS West Hub
2.2.2 Byappanahalli (Benninganahalli) - CRS East Hub
2.2.3 Yelahanka - CRS North Hub
With trains from Yeswantpur towards Chickballapur & from Byappanahalli towards Dodballapur converging here Yelahanka is well positioned to be the CRS North hub. It serves major industrial regions of ITIR, DBP, BIA & Dodballapur. With a stop for HSRL also, this station needs to be developed into a multifunctional hub and taken up on the lines of Yeswantpur & Byappanahalli.
2.3.1 Yeswantpur - Yelahanka - Devanahalli - Chickballapur
2.3.2 Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Jakkur - Yelahanka - Doddballapur
2.3.3 Yeswantpur - Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Anekal - Hosur
2.3.4 Tumkur/Nelamangala - Yeswantpur - Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli)
2.3.5 Yeswantpur/Yelahanka - Byappanahalli(Benninganahalli) - Whitefield - Malur - Bangarpet
2.3.6 Yelahanka - Yeshwantpur - NICE PRR/City - Kengeri - Ramanagara
Station |
Catchment Wards/Area |
Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur |
17 |
35 |
|
37 |
36 |
|
42 |
26 |
|
44 |
34 |
Lottegolahalli |
36 |
36 |
|
18 |
26 |
|
35 |
30 |
Hebbal |
19 |
24 |
|
20 |
26 |
|
21 |
24 |
|
8 |
22 |
Banaswadi |
49 |
32 |
|
59 |
36 |
|
28 |
35 |
Total Coverage |
|
422 |
No Station |
22 |
26 |
|
23 |
35 |
|
32 |
27 |
|
30 |
35 |
|
60 |
35 |
|
50 |
32 |
|
56 |
29 |
|
57 |
30 |
Total Uncovered |
|
249 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 6.71 lakh people 37.1% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Station |
Catchment Wards/Area |
Population in ,000 |
Bellandur |
149 |
25 |
Karmelrama |
150 |
20 |
|
Sarjapur |
20 |
Heelalige |
Bommasandra |
20 |
Anekal road |
Anekal+Jigani+Attibele |
200 |
Hosur |
Hosur |
200 |
Total Coverage |
|
485 |
No Station |
81 |
25 |
|
85 |
22 |
|
86 |
23 |
Total Uncovered |
|
70 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 5.55 lakh people 12.6% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Baiyappanhalli | 50 | 31 |
Channasandra | 26 | 22 |
Yelahanka | 4 | 25 |
Total Coverage | 78 | |
No Station | Horamavu | 28 |
Hennur- Bagalur Rd | 25 | |
Thanisandra Rd | 25 | |
Jakkur | 15 | |
NH7 Junction @ Nehru Nagar | 10 | |
Total Not Covered | 103 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 1.81 lakh people 56.9% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur | 37 | 35 |
Lottegollahalli | 8 | 10 |
Kodigehalli | 9 | 12 |
Yelahanka | 10 | |
Total Coverage | 67 | |
No Station | Gokula Extension (36) | 35 |
BEL /Devi Nagar | 10 | |
Tata Nagar | 10 | |
CQAL Layout | 10 | |
L & T /ALLalsandra Mn Rd | 10 | |
Jakkur | 40 | |
Yelahanka Tn (3, 4) | 49 | |
Total Not Covered | 164 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 2.31 lakh people 70% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yelahanka | 3, 4 | 50 |
Rajankunte | 10 | |
Doddaballapur | 70 | |
Total Coverage | 130 | |
No Station | ||
Yelahanka Tn | 10 | |
Kanchanhalli | 20 | |
Naganahalli | 10 | |
Harohalli | 25 | |
Puttenhalli | 15 | |
Total Not Covered | 80 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 2.1 lakh people 38.2% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yelahanka | 3, 4 | 49 |
Bettahalsoor | Sonnapanhalli, MVIT, Ganganahalli | 20 |
Daddajala | 10 | |
Devenahalli | 78 | |
Avati | 37 | |
Venkatgiri Kote | 10 | |
Nandi Hills | 10 | |
Chik Ballapur | 62 | |
Total Coverage | 276 | |
No Station | ||
Yelahanka Tn | 10 | |
Kanchanhalli | 20 | |
Doddasandra | 10 | |
BIAL | 25 | |
MVIT, Sonappanhalli, Ganganahalli | 15 | |
Total Not Covered | 80 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 2.76 lakh people 28.9% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur | 37, 45, 36, 17 | 141 |
Chik Banavara | 164 | |
Soldevanahalli | 5 | |
Golhalli | 74 | |
Bhairanayakanhalli | 5 | |
Dodbele | 5 | |
Muddalingahalli | 5 | |
Nidvanda | 5 | |
Dobbspet | 25 | |
Hirehalli | 5 | |
Kyatsandra | 162 | |
Tumkur | 248 | |
Total Coverage | 844 | |
No Station | 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 | 162 |
41 | 27 | |
Tarabandahalli | 10 | |
Hesrghatta | 5 | |
Nelamangala Cross | 10 | |
Thayamogundlu | 10 | |
Total Not Covered | 224 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 10.68 lakh people 20.97% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 |
Yeshwantpur | 37, 44, 36 | 104 |
Malleswaram | 45,66 | 70 |
Bangalore City | 120, 121 | 70 |
Nayandhalli | 22 | |
Jnana Bharati (BU) | 25 | |
Kengeri | 42 | |
Hejjala | 22 | |
Bidadi | 50 | |
Ketohalli | 12 | |
Ramanagaram | 80 | |
Total Coverage | 497 | |
No Station | RVCE/Duvasapalya | 40 |
NICE Rd Intersection | 25 | |
Country Club | 20 | |
Humpa Pura/RK Estates | 10 | |
Kumbalgodu | 10 | |
Ghousia College | 15 | |
Total Not Covered | 120 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 6.12 lakh people 24.96% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
In order to ensure full coverage the following stations are proposed along the route
Station | Catchment Wards/Area | Population in ,000 | |
Baiyappanhalli | 50, 58 | 66 | |
K R Puram | 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 | 120 | |
Whitefield | 83, 84, 85 | 69 | |
Malur | 27 | ||
Byatrayanhalli | 10 | ||
Tekal | 10 | ||
Bangarapet | 40 | ||
Total Coverage | 342 | ||
No Station | Garudachar Palya | 20 | |
Kadugodi | 22 | ||
NH 207 Junction | 10 | ||
Tarabhalli | 10 | ||
SH 95 Junction | 5 | ||
Total Not Covered | 67 |
As seen from the above table, out of the total catchment of 4 lakh people 16% of the population along the route do not have access to the service because of lack of station in the vicinity
Thus it is highly recommended that the Suburban CRS be run under an SPV called Commuter Rail Authority (CRA) which will consist at a bare minimum the following stake holders
It is important the the SPV be setup first so the implementation can be done in an organized fashion. Without this each decision will be made in a disjointed fashion leading to delays in implementation and unsatisfactory end results
In 2007, the Rail India Technical and Economic Society (RITES), a Government of India enterprise, brought out a Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Plan (CTTP) for Bangalore. The report states that “Major developments have been proposed in the suburban towns of Bangalore by BMRDA in the BMR. This is likely to increase interaction betweenBangalore and these suburban towns. There will be need to provide commuter rail services to these towns fromBangalore”. It also says that the commuter rail system should be extended up to BMRDA’s new townships and beyond to act as sub-urban services.
It also goes on to state “In the suburban segment, the main challenges are the creation of adequate capacity, segregation of commuter lines from long-distance lines and expansion of services to ensure comfort of commuters. Partnership with state authorities will be necessary for development of suburban rail systems. Railways may also aim at integrating the metro-rail and sub-urban rail-systems under a single management in partnership with the respective state/city authorities.”
The railway vision plan 2020 says this on stations "However, the stations are inadequately designed and equipped to handle such large multitudes of passengers. They do not provide easy access or comfortable experience prior to boarding or after disembarkation from trains. Street-level access is generally restricted to one or two end-platforms (except at terminal type of station layouts). Inter-platform connectivity is through foot over-bridges which are often inadequate, apart from being passenger-unfriendly"
It is very important that in order to make Commuter Rail useful and viable, it has to have the tight integration with city’s PT systems. Integration with other PT systems provides the commuter with point to point connectivity right from the town outside
Bengaluru to the specific location in the city. The Integration could range from Commuter Rail station at the same physical location to Commuter Rail station being little walking distance to other PT transit stations. Carriages having facilities
to carry cycles will go a long way in helping promote green last mile options. It also benefits the economically weaker
sections to save on the total cost of commuting
The lack of a proper last mile connectivity has been a major reason for failure of usage of CRS in many cities. BMTC needs to support CRS by providing the feeder service to all the CRS stops/stations in the BMTC operational area. The feeder service at bare minimum should connect the CRS stations to the nearest BMTC transit center. Looking at BMTC footprint this should be easy proposition. All it may require is some change in the route or could be an exclusive feeder loop connecting the station and the nearest transit center. Acceptance of Common Fare Card for easy transfer would be highly required and beneficial to all.
Common branding enables common facilities to be offered under single roof. It is administratively easier to provide information and services. This requires the current SWR services to destinations in the commuter rail target list also to be
rolled into the ambit of commuter rail. SWR trains to destinations like Bangarpet, Hosur and nearby towns can become Commuter rail services thus enabling common ticketing schemes and timetable sharing. This inorganic acquisition of existing services will help scale the Commuter Rail services faster.
The Railways vision plan also mentions "Distribution channels for railway tickets would be constantly innovated so that obtaining a railway ticket is completely hassle-free. PRS/UTS terminals, e-ticket services, tickets through post offices, ATMs, petrol pumps and smart-card based tickets for unreserved travel would be expanded to improve access. New and emerging technologies will be harnessed towards this end"
Common ticketing system between CRS, Metro & BMTC must be formed
Availability of basic commuter amenities is a must for the success of the Commuter Rail and increased patronage. Below listed are these basic commuter amenities:
The towns located around Bengaluru city are the growth centers and Commuter Rail is their smart life line for their regular commute, business trips, goods transport from and to their towns. CR can facilitate the goods transportation by having rakes for carrying bulk goods and products. One good example is seen in Mumbai's local service, where each train has a special bogey exclusively for carrying bulk goods.
Following trains which are currently running as slow/passenger trains needs to be brought into the ambit of CR.
Following Trains to be completely converted into EMU coaches on Bangalore to Bangarapet for Commutre Rail | ||||||||
1 | 526SW | Bangalore City | 7:00 | Marikuppam | 9:35 | Passenger | Starting | Only 16 Kms extra & 5 more stations exists |
102SW | Bangalore City | 9:20 | Bangarapet junction | 11:00 | Passenger | This train is SBC- Arakkonam Junction | ||
2 | 530SW | Bangalore City | 10:00 | Bangarapet junction | 12:05 | Passenger | Pair for 529SW, wasting 20 minites at Bangalore city | |
3 | 511SW | Bangalore City | 12:20 | Marikuppam | 15:15 | Passenger | Pair for 512SW, wasting 100 minites at Bangalore city | |
4 | 532SW | Bangalore City | 14:45 | Bangarapet junction | 16:25 | Passenger | Pair for 531SW, wasting 15 minites at Bangalore city | |
5 | 503SW | Bangalore Cantt. | 15:00 | Bangarapet junction | 17:05 | Passenger | ||
6 | 524SW | Bangalore City | 18:05 | Marikuppam | 20:35 | Passenger | Pair for 525SW, wasting 15 minites at Bangalore city | |
7 | 6522 | Bangalore City | 19:35 | Bangarapet junction | 21:10 | Express | ||
8 | 523SW | Marikuppam | 6:20 | Bangalore City | 9:15 | Passenger | Starting | |
9 | 529SW | Bangarapet junction | 7:30 | Bangalore City | 9:30 | Passenger | Starting | |
10 | 512SW | Marikuppam | 8:00 | Bangalore City | 10:30 | Passenger | Starting | |
11 | 502SW | Bangarapet junction | 11:00 | Bangalore Cantt. | 13:00 | Passenger | ||
12 | 531SW | Bangarapet junction | 12:40 | Bangalore City | 14:25 | Passenger | Pair for 530SW, wasting 30 minites at Bangarpet Jn | |
13 | 525SW | Marikuppam | 14:00 | Bangalore City | 17:00 | Passenger | ||
101SW | Bangarapet junction | 16:30 | Bangalore City | 18:45 | Passenger | This train is Arakkonam Junction - SBC | ||
14 | 6521 | Bangarapet junction | 21:40 | Bangalore City | 23:25 | Express | Pair for 6522, wasting 20 minites at Bangarpet Jn | |
Total 7 + 1 pair of Passanger trains & one express Trains running between Bangalore city to Bangarpet excluding Arakkonam can be converted into Commuter Rail | ||||||||
Following Trains need to be convereted into Commtre Rail once Electrification of Tracks completed ( after 6 months ) | ||||||||
1 | 551SW | Bangalore City | 8:40 | Chikballapur | 10:50 | Passenger | ||
2 | 595Sw | Bangalore City | 18:00 | Chikballapur | 19:55 | Passenger | ||
3 | 596SW | Chikballapur | 7:55 | Bangalore City | 9:45 | Passenger | ||
4 | 552SW | Chikballapur | 15:55 | Bangalore City | 18:00 | Passenger | ||
5 | YH-1 | Yesvanthpur | 6:20 | Hosur | 7:55 | Passenger | ||
6 | YH-2 | Yesvanthpur | 15:35 | Hosur | 17:05 | Passenger | ||
7 | YD-1 | Yesvanthpur | 10:40 | Devanhallai | 11:45 | Passenger | ||
8 | HY-1 | Hosur | 8:10 | Yesvanthpur | 9:50 | Passenger | ||
9 | HY-2 | Hosur | 17:45 | Yesvanthpur | 19:20 | Passenger | ||
10 | DY-1 | Devanhallai | 13:15 | Yesvanthpur | 14:35 | Passenger | ||
11 | 221Sw | Bangalore City | 9:20 | Tumkur | 11:05 | Passenger | ||
12 | 225SW | Bangalore City | 13:35 | Tumkur | 15:25 | Passenger | ||
13 | 226SW | Tumkur | 15:50 | Bangalore City | 17:40 | Passenger | ||
14 | 222SW | Tumkur | 11:25 | Bangalore City | 13:15 | Passenger | ||
Another 7 Pair of Trains tol be converted into EMU Rakes after electrification of Tracks and to be added into Commuter Rail | ||||||||
Effectively existing 14 pair of Trains should be running as Commuter Rail within 6-12 months and more services to be introduced by utilizing the capacity of Traks and Rakes. | ||||||||
We can have Fast Commuter Rail similar to SBC - Bangarpet |
New Stations are listed in the section 2.4.1 to 2.4.9
Sr No | Segment | Distance in Kms | Doubling Needed | Electrification Needed | Status / Remarks | |
1 | Yelahanka to Yesavnthpur | 12.45 | Yes | Done | Already Railway Budget Sanctioned, DPR is ready, Tenders to be called | |
2 | Yelahanka to K R Puram | 15.80 | Yes | Done | Already Railway Budget Sanctioned, DPR is ready, Tenders to be called | |
3 | Yelahanka to Chikballapur | 46.05 | Yes | Yes | ||
4 | Yelahanka to Dodballapur | 20.72 | Yes | Yes | ||
5 | Yesavnthpur to Banaswadi | 14.76 | Yes | Done | ||
6 | Banaswadi to Hosur | 51.36 | Yes | Yes | ||
7 | Banswadi to Baiyyappanahalli | 4.47 | Yes | Done | ||
8 | Yesvanthpur to Soldevanhalli | 10.78 | No | Yes | ||
9 | Soladevanhalli to Nelamngala & upto NH-4 | 8.00 / 10.00 | Yes | Yes | ||
10 | Soladevanhalli to Tumkur | 53.22 | No | Yes | ||
11 | Kengeri to Ramanagaram | 32.43 | No | Yes | As part of Bangalore to Mysore Doubling & Electrification, this streach electrification will be done at time. | Need to check current status of electrification |
270.04 | ||||||
From the above Double Track Exists : | 96.43 Kms | |||||
From the above Electrified Track exists : | 47.48 Kms | |||||
Total Track Doubling Needed : | 173.61 Kms | |||||
Electrification Needed : | 222.56 Kms | To check Electrification for 32.43 Kms of Kengeri to Ramangaram | ||||
In the above Yelahanka to Yesavnthpur, Yelahanka to K R Puram, Yesvanthpur to Banaswadi Doubling of Track Dist : 43 Kms are very critical for Commuter Rail take off. |
All over the world, the trend in public transport system is to integrate all modes of PT systems. Gone are the days when each one of them operated in complete isolation. In India also this integration philosophy is slowly picking up steam though have long way to go.
It is very important that in order to make CRS useful and viable, it has to have the tight integration with city’s PT systems. Integration with other PT systems provides the commuter with point to point connectivity right from the town outside Bengaluru to the specific location in the city.
The Integration could range from CRS station at the same physical location to CRS station being little walking distance to other PT transit stations. Simple access connectivity connectivity can be like this.
Fortunately Namma Metro intersects the IR routes at many places in the city. CRS simply needs to integrate with Namma Metro at these locations, i.e provide easy interchange. Some of the locations that can provide easy transit include:
Exclusive connectivity to the new airport via high speed rail as an when becomes operational also provides the opportunity for CRS to integrate with HSRL thereby providing the commuters from the nearby towns another PT connection to reach the new airport and vice versa. Interchange with HSRL needs to be provided at both Yelahanka and Hebbal.
35 new proposed stations
160 is the possible number of services per day on all routes suggested for optimum efficiency
376 Kilometers is the approximate distance covered by the proposed routes
1,50,000 is the carrying capacity per day which can be increased by adding rakes
45,00,000 is the number of people in the catchment areas covered by the current SWR tracks
33% is the percentage of the population in the catchment areas who need access to a local station
2010 is the year for Commuter Rail in Bengaluru
SPV is the way to go for rolling out commuter services with all stakeholders being a part of this entity working together to make this a success
All images, trademarks, information used here have been gathered from the information made available in the public domain. All copyrights rest with the original authors. Praja.in does not vouch for the accuracy or veracity of the information collected from public sources and 3rd parties and not liable for any consequential effects of the usage of the same. |
The draft report of the Implementation of Commuter Rail for Bengaluru has been released by RITES to DULT. DULT has shared the report with us for our comments. We are expected to profvide our feedback before 30th of this month. SO do leave your feedback as comments to this thread.
In June 2012, RITES submitted a draft report on feasibility / go forward details on commuter rail service (CRS) for Bengaluru to DULT. Here is a summary and abstract of relevant portions of this report. The report is also available in full at this link.
Sec 3.2 - Potential in terms of Capacity
Maximum Peak throughput:
Rail - 60000 Passengers/Hr
Metro - 40000 passenger/Hr
BRT - 500 Passengers/Hr
Sec 3.4 - Potential in terms of Cheapest Alternative
Sec 3.6 - Capacity Assesment Metro Vs CRS
Capacity of CRS train
1 CRS Train = 2.67 X 1.26 = 3.3 metro trains.
Sec 4.5, Page 32, 2nd Para
"...Therefore, it is recommended not to terminate the commuter trains short of Bangalore. Terminals need to be the farthermost stations in the CRS i.e. Tumkur, Mandya, Bangarapet and Hosur etc. All other stations including major stations like Bangalore City, Yesvantpur etc. need to be passing through stations..."
RITES report has divided all the works that are needed for CRS into 3 Phases. The Phases are 1A, 1B and 2. Each of these have been identified with slew of works to be carried over, cost of works and the time frame to complete the works.
There is the 4th Phase that has been identified in the report. There are works earmarked for that phase. But there is no cost or time frame has been given citing the reasons of continuous improvements and too far in time to give a definite cost and time.
Works
Invest Cost
Time Frame
Result - CRS with caryying capacity of 5 Lakh trips per day
Works
Investment Cost
Time Frame
Result - CRS with enhance capacity of 10 Lakh daily trips.
Works
Investment Cost
Time Frame
Result - CRS with total carrying capacity of more than 25 lakh daily trips.
Works - Extension of CRS reach and activities
Note - No cost or time frame is given in the report.
This will increase the SBC 's current handling capacity from 60 to 150 pairs of trains
This will increase YPR terminal capacity from 37 to 60 pairs of trains.
This will allow BYPL to handle 70 pairs of trains from 0 pair it is handling now.
This will bring relief to SBC and enhances the commuter capacity.
Here is an overview of the Praja Report on CRS, titled "Namma Railu".
Decongestion of Bengaluru is a burning issue facing the administrators today. With the kind of visibility Bengaluru has in the international arena and the role India is going to play in the world of the future, it is important for both central and state governments to sit up and take notice. Ignoring the long term mass transport needs of the city can backfire on the country. The economy of any city thrives on availability of good quality labor at affordable cost. Expensive housing and increased travel times only put more pressure on productivity of human capital. This may ultimately lead to flight of capital and hurt the economy with cascading effect.
Housing has already become unaffordable in Bengaluru for the lower and middle classes which is going to form a major portion of the workforce of the future. Also, a 76% decline in vegetation cover and 79% decline in water bodies due to the increase in built up space in the urban areas of Bengaluru means, brownfield growth centers at approximately one hours commute from Bengaluru needs to be developed. No amount of connectivity within the city will be successful if that connectivity is not supplemented by mass transit to these growth centers. The key is frequent, low cost connectivity which can be achieved by utilizing and enhancing the existing train tracks between Bengaluru and these growth centers. Multiple reports over 27 years including RITES surveys have confirmed this fact.
This Commuter Rail Service for Bengaluru will require the following
The benefits of the Commuter Rail Service is multifold
The Call to Action report prepared by Praja.in provides a citizens perspective of a quickly implementable, viable alternative. The report lays out the need and urgency of running full fledged dedicated commuter trains under a dedicated SPV set up for this purpose.