HAL with higher landing charges/airport taxes than BIAL ??
- Login or register to post comments
- ಈ Forum topic ಅನ್ನು ಸ್ನೇಹಿತರಿಗೆ ಕಳಿಸಿ
Praja.in comment guidelines
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!
Let market forces determine HAL vs. BIAL
Jammy
Before BIAL opened, I had proposed a cap of 30% of total traffic, starting with 3 million passengers for HAL, and allow all domestic flights from HAL. Limiting by distance or aircraft type will create too many hurdles and airlines will loose interest.
In HAL the demarkation is already in place. AAI gets the fees from the terminal, and HAL gets the landing and parking fees.
AAI is part of BIAL. So there should be no reason, why this cooperation cannot be extended to cover AAI's operations at HAL. This would be the compensation to BIAL. Income from an infrastructure they did not invest it.
The need of the hour today, is a low cost airport. I have written about this in my article http://aviation.deveshaga.... HAL airport has to be positioned as a low cost low featured airport. I also recommend your reading professor Richard De Neufville of MIT. He has some articles on the low cost airport systems required to ensure low cost airlines' success.
-----------------------
Regards
Devesh R. Agarwal
Visit my aviation blog at http://aviation.deveshagarwal.com
Regards
Devesh
Bangalore Aviation
Enjoy life, destroy FUD