Mis-use of Kannada by Registrar of Societies

@ Suhas

When you come on after a long time, it will be good if you could go into the fuller details of what is being written, and then make your comments, instead of mixing issues. As for promotion of local language and culture, there are many better ways of doing it - here's an example

@ Suhas  -  Every body is with you in not just saving, but even promoting the use of local languages. But, whereas it's all very fine when it comes to art and culture, if you want to extend it to law, engineering, medicine, etc, it's going to take a lot of doing. And, I am not quite sure it's worth the effort. I have elaborated more on that here. And, anyway, that's a separate debate altogether, a lot of which has already taken place on PRAJA, for eg here and here.

Also, the letter that I had appended (in the original post), in a way alleging reverse discrimination by the GoK, is by a true-blue Kannadiga (perhaps, more so than even you), who loves his mother tongue no less than a Kuvempu does. And, very clearly, these doings of the government johnnies do not come out of any love of the language.

So, let's be clear about what we are talking.
 

@ Suhas  -  I had attended this seminar today, which, as is the general practice these days, was conducted in a mixture of both English and Kannada. And, being on the 74th constitutional amendment, even the people who made presentations in Kannada, used slides made out in English. And, my knowledge of Kannada was good enough to follow most of the proceedings. Beyond that, I have no specific interest in furthering my knowledge of the language.

As compared to that, someone like say Dr U R Ananthamurthy may want to keep furthering his knowledge of the language, perhaps to appreciate the finer nuances of a Yakshagana performance. And, as many there of the likes of me, there are enough of the likes of Dr URA, to ensure the vibrancy of the language and the culture associated with it. And, with globalisation, their number is in fact growing. I may even venture to add that our own Shastri and Tarle are perhaps more Kannadiga's today as NRI's than they were when living in Karnataka.  

So, nobody need have any apprehensions. The Indian languages, deeply embedded as they are in the local culture, are safe and sound. The impositions, particularly out of mercenary pursuits, are what constitute the threat, if at all.  

And here, besides, I am talking from a legal stand-point.

 

My appeal (no:KIC8603PTN2010) came up before the Information Commission yesterday, and the Commissioner dismissed it supposedly on the following two grounds:

1) That only if RoS rejected my registration application, citing the specific reason stated, there can be a case, and not on a hypothetical question. He seemed in no mood to entertain my argument that I was seeking an information in advance, which I believed was what the 'right to information' was all about. Even my telling him that we had in fact submitted the draft documents made out in English, that they were rejected because of that, and that we were told to have them made out in Kannada, did not cut much ice with him.

2) That the RoS has to abide by the government circular directing the usage of Kannada for administrative purposes. When I tried to bring up the legal position saying that the circular had no legal authority, and of English continuing to enjoy the status of an official language of the state, he asked me to pose that to the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal.

Going by my earlier experience, cited here, it was clear that this was also going to be a largely futile exercise, considering that most of the Commissioners are from government background, and not generally given to independent thinking.

Whatever, I had already referred the earlier case to a senior lawyer (another true-blue Kannadiga, born and brought up in namma Bengaluru), and when I spoke to him after this verdict, he expressed interest in pursuing it in the tribunal or the High Court, as may be applicable, after the vacation break. Simultaneously, let me see if I can revive the matter with the NAC.

PS: After the hearing, when talking to the new RoS (who had attended the hearing), he seemed fully appreciative of my stance, even to the extent of admitting that the court is likely to uphold my position. As a via media, for now, he suggested that we make out the documents made out with English translations following every Kannada paragraph. I told him that I may be OK with Kannada translations following every English paragraph, meaning essentially that in case of disputes, the reference points will be the English text.

He has said that he can possibly consider that. If we are in a hurry for registration, I think we can manage it now, without the 'customary payments'.

Due to the technical reasons Kannada  language can not be made as an administrative language in High Court, said  Chief Justice Vikramjit Sen on Monday.

- - -Justice Sen observed that Kannada can be used along with English in district and session courts.

During the hearing of petition filed by R K G M M Mahaswami, Justice Sen said that if Kannada was made  the administrative language in High Court then it would violate Section 348 of  Constitution. A petition was filed before the Delhi High Court to make Hindi the  administrative language but it was rejected as generally English is used  everywhere and advocates can argue their cases anywhere in the country. “If Kannada is made the administrative language then it may make the hearings in the court difficult,” observed Sen. Chief Justice N K Jain committee recommended to use Kannada as administrative language along with English in district and session courts. The state had issued notification in this regard.  ‘The court can not make Kannada as the administrative language,” Sen remarked.

For the full text of the report in the New Indian Express, click here.

When the Justice N K Jain committee recommendation was for use of Kannada as administrative language along with English in district and session courts, shouldn't the Registrar of Societies, Karnataka, also be allowing documentation in English if a society prefers it that way, like in the case of the international organisation referred to in the attachment to the original post?

More and more, it looks like only directives from courts will be obeyed by the government agencies.