A petition as per attachment is being sent by to Sri S Suresh Kumar, Hon’ble Minister for Law, Govt of Karnataka, in the coming week. If he continues to hold the portfolio (assuming he continues as a minister), an attempt will be made to meet him soon.
In the meanwhile, a request will be sent out to all civil society groups, RWA's etc to send out similar letters to the minister. It will be good if others connected to other civil society groups could also join in the exercise.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Mu-KAOA.doc | 24 KB |
Comments
posted
With Sri Suresh Kumar back in the cabinet, and holding the same portfolios, I sent out the petitions today by regd post. Will give it a little time, and then perhaps organise a meet.
Meanwhile, it will be good if we can get more and more RWA's/ NGO's to send out similarly-worded petitions.
glaring malpractices
The Competition Commission of India (CCI), the free trade regulator, has imposed a penalty of Rs 630 crore on real estate major DLF for misusing its dominant position in the market by drafting one-sided agreements with flat buyers in Belaire housing complex in Gurgaon.
According to the flat owners, DLF violated building restriction norms. Although it had approval to build 19 floors, it constructed 29 floors and cut down the super area, common area and other facilities. Flat buyers also said that DLF announced the project and entered into agreements without getting the required clearances from the authorities. In its order issued on Friday, CCI said the agreement with buyers is not just one-sided but draconian. It has found that the penalty provision in case of delay in project as per buyers’ agreement is discriminatory and favoured the builder.
For the full report in the ToI, click here.
While CCI's action is laudable, perhaps these kinds of malpractices could have been averted, even to begin with, had the lacunae in the relevant Acts been rectified in time. Well, it's also possible that they were drafted that way, and left that way, at the instance of the DLF's of this world.
All the more reason why there should be a concerted effort on the part of the citizens to press for immediate redressal of the problem.
Talk show on Radio Indigo - 10AM, 3rd Sept
The matter is likely to be raised before Honorable Sri Suresh Kumar on our behalf by Mr H S Balram on the 'Straight Talk' show between 10 AM and 12 noon, Saturday - 3rd Sept, on Radio Indigo - 91.9 fm
proactive comments by minister
The relevant part of the interview may be accessed here
YES; ACCESSED, AND HEARD.IN
YES; ACCESSED, AND HEARD.
IN MY PERCEPTION, AND TO MY UNDERSTANDING, THE MINSTER'S RESPONSE , THOUGH HELD OUT HOPES, WAS NOT VERY CLEAR AND ENCOUAGING OR ASSURING TO THE POINT.
ONE OF THE POINTS POSED WAS, I BELIEVE, RELATED TO 'COMMOIN AREAS' AND SUGGESTION WAS TO BRING ABOUT CLARITY IN LAW IN FAVOUR OF PURCHASERS OF 'FLATS'. IF SO, I ONLY HOPE, THAT THE MINSTER, AFTER HAVING BEEN SUITABLY BRIEFED, UNLESS ALREADY BEEN DONE SO, SO THAT ONE COULD EXPECT THE CLARITY EVENTUALLY BROUGHT IN WOULD BE ON THE SAME LINES AS STRICTLY REQUIRED AND EMINENTLY DESIRED.
WHAT REALLY CALLED FOR ARE:PRIMA FACIE BRIEFLY THESE:
1. THE KOFA NEEDS TO BE AMENDED, BY CHANGING THE DEFINITION OF 'FLAT' THEREIN TO SPECIFICALLY INCLUDE 'APARTMENT'(AS DONE LONG AGO IN MAHARASHTRA).
2, . INTER- DEPARTMENTAL STEPS TAKEN, SO AS TO ENSURE THAT ALL REGISTRATIONS OF KAOA ARE DONE ONLY WITH KRCS, NOT WITH KRS.
EVEN THEN, WHAT IS GOING TO BE LEFT IN LIMBO, IS THE FATE OF THOSE REGISTERED AS RWAs.
AS I SEE IT, THE OBJEECTIVE SHOULD BE TO SEEK AND HAVE BROUGHT ABOUT ALL SUCH CHANGES , EITHER THROUGH CHANGES IN THE EXTANT LAW AND/ OR BY WAY OF NOTIFICATIONS, UNLESS THOSE ARE DONE IN A WHOLESOME AND COMPREHENSIVE MANNER , FALLOUT PROBLEMS TO BE FACED WITH COULD BE GALORE.
INCIDENTALLY, FOR A RECENT DEVELOPMENT AT THE INSTANCE OF/FROM CREDAI, ATTENTION IS INVITED TO MY BLOG POSTED TODAY@ http://vswaminathan-vswaminathan-swamilook.blogspot.com/2011/09/good-morning-news.html
I AM OPEN TO OTHERS' VIEWS ON THE FOREGOING, ESPECIALLY SHOULD THEY BE AT VARIANCE, IN SUBSTANCE.
For an Update on STP, the ongoing struggle of old apt. complexes with BWSSB, refer the recent Post http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in/articles/42
@ glaring malpractices ( by
@ glaring malpractices ( by Mr M Rao)
For certain other areas requiring to be focused on, please read the Blog@
http://vswaminathan-vswaminathan-swamilook.blogspot.com/2011/08/cci-slaps-penalty-notice-on-nse-times.html
For an Update on STP, the ongoing struggle of old apt. complexes with BWSSB, refer the recent Post http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in/articles/42
Law on Apartments - Irritant called the "limited common areas"
In this context, it calls for a pointed mention that, however, in respect of a ‘flat’ (as distinct from ‘apartment’, under the separate scheme of things as envisaged in the applicable Flats Act, there is no scope at all for any such issues to arise. Be that as it should, in those cases where any such issue arose in the past and taken to courts, the view taken by the courts in favour of the buyers is noteworthy.
For an Update on STP, the ongoing struggle of old apt. complexes with BWSSB, refer the recent Post http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in/articles/42
apartment owners and builders.
I am living in Suncity aprtments, located in sarjapur road. It was built by corporate leisure. As a Senior citizen I was not very particular about various clauses in the agreement which I signed. But now some active youngn owners have formed an association.they are pursuing various issues legally after exhausting all avenues at a compromise but I do not know how it will come out. I was told the law is loaded in favour of builders who control the Karnataka government whichever party from BJP<Congress and JD(U) come to power.One cannot go to consumer court all the time.Hope this project by Praja fructifes. I hope they involve many association in the Outer ring road, sarjapur road belt.
Greatness lies NOT in never falling but in rising everytime we fall.
http://www.captainjohann.blogspot.com