It might be the one legged cousin of super glamorous Metro. But the Mono project isn't dead if you thought so based on recent lack of news and updates on it. The Hindu reported that BMRC is close to making the call on picking a consultant for Mono. As expected, newspapers have more meat than BMRC website itself. However, BMRC has this cryptic sounding note on their news page right now:
"THE SELECTION OF THE MONORAIL CONSULTANT IS STILL UNDER PROCESS. THE LETTERS WHICH HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE WEBSITE ARE HEREBY WITHDRAWN. INCONVENIENCE REGRETTED."
Wonder what had happened there! Did they announce a winner and then withdraw it? Hope not.
Meanwhile, to remind you of the Mono routes:
1) Kanakapura Road to Mysore Road Junction with a T connection from Kathriguppe to National College.2) Bannerghatta National Park to Adugodi.
3) Jnanabharathi to Mysore Road (Outer Ring Road) with a T connection to Toll Gate on Magadi Road.
4) Tumkur Road on Outer Ring Road to Bellary Road
Comments
i think what happened was
Metro and Mono: Why do we need both ?
Hello Visitor, excellent
Ok I am registered.
I was expecting to be prompted for an username when I made the above post. Too late by the time I realized that the post was done :)
In continuation of my previous post, is there precedent in any city where they have adopted two parallel modes of RTS beginning construction of the same time ?
Hi mii2,
Metro is Unparallel - Metro Needs Lot of Land Compared to Mono
u/g metro....
Ever since Metrail proposed
Public Transit What's In It For Bangalore...
Fundamentally we have to contrast between what Bangalore gains from mass transit and what mass transit gains from Bangalore.
First of all Bangalore even began considering mass transit because it was, and continues to strain under the weight of its own growth and quality of life is suffering. Environment, social access(how many footpaths have been chopped off to widen streets?), transit safety, family time, productivity, mental health - Bangalore is risking all these only because people are moving from one place to another. Bangalore can only gain by weaning as many people as possible off private transit and transporting them through public transit towards achieving quality of life goals. IMHO, this is the most important thing and nothing else matters.
The danger with mindless peddling of untested, "economically feasible" alternatives is that if it does not scale then feasibility of public transit is risked, which means greater burden on the streets and we are back to square one.
Mono-Metro Same Stuff, Only One Has More Impact Than The Other...
The fundamental idea behind Metro & Mono is the same. You build exclusive paths through the city, which provide you with Right Of Way (ROW) on which you run carriers. The carriers actually carry people. One carrier runs on two rails, the other runs on a sole rail. So obviously, the technology of the carrier is different. Apart from this all other differences between the two are a direct function of the capacity. For example, power requirements, station platform lengths etc. Other wise in terms of over all land for stations & yards the requirements are similar. Consider the land required to construct ROW. The mono ROW/Metro ROW ratio is 89% . So, land acquisition to construct ROW is not much different. Also for both land for stations + parking + yards will be similar, in monos case without much return in terms of number of people carried.
Even assuming full utilization of stated specs mono only promises to move about 1 lakh people per day. The longest mono network in the world, Osaka, currently carries about 77000 people per day. Delhi metro, even when currently underutilized, transported 450,000 people/day last year over a network that is similarly dense to what mono BOOT is proposing. And ridership is yet to peak, meanwhile benefits have begun to accrue.
So if we take all the trouble to build right of way based system then might as well put a high capacity carrier on it. Why settle for a low capacity carrier, and limit our potential, especially when overall costs are similar.
If you average the operation & maintenance costs per passenger per mile, over a set of mono systems and Metro/Metro type systems in this list you get $0.66 for mono and $0.44 for metro. If you considered the park monos too, then mono is infact, $1.26.
For a proposal like mono’s BOOT the principle gain is return on investment. Metrics that are important to Bangalore are only secondary. Irrespective of effectiveness of it in actually moving people in Bangalore’s overall context, mono BOOT will make money, if only due to the sheer size of Bangalore’s population. That is guaranteed. But what is not guaranteed is that it translates as any relief to Bangalore. (Notice, that BOOT mono proposal usurps exclusive rights, and there is no balance of competition that would ensure that what happened with reach and service in cellular networks will happen with transit networks.)
Bottom line is this, Bangalore needs a public transit that alleviates the congestion problem as much as possible, it does not need a public transit system naam ke vaaste, so that we can say Bangalore has public transit, without it actually translating into something meaningful for Bangalore itself.
Mono is only a short-term solution
We need a feel for mono at least in some part of city to debate
Costly experiment.
Construction the mono to get a feel of it is just a costly experiment.
As far as suitability to indian conditions is concerned then we know that Delhi and Calcutta have successfully implemented the metro solution. Are there any mono implementation in India ?
We don't have the luxury of changing the design/system midway to ELRTS if the mono is deemed unsuitable.
Mono Has Been Already Planned by BMRC-It will not be experiment
Mono has already been planned by BMRC and tenders have been called. It will not be any waste if we have it in some part of the city as quickly as possible and checkout how it works out. Ofcourse, people always say Metro should have been here - but the land, the time and expenses are too high to be planned in all parts of the city.
Even Singapore, London,Tokyo and Kualalampur has got monorail in some or the other part of the city. It is a waste if a metro runs where very less people use it and also which comes at a very high cost and lot of people loosing their houses. Currently, BMTC introduced Volvo buses to attract people using private vehicles, but, even then, it is successful only to ITPL route. Rest of the routes, it runs vacant with huge loss - Samething should not happen to Metro.
Why delay in Mono
mono-logue