Anomalies in stamp duty valuation
Highlight lack of fair and just methodology for determining the stamp duty leviable on property transactions
Whenever a property transaction takes place, there exists a fair and just methodology for determining the stamp duty leviable, taking care of buyer's, seller's, developer's, as well as government's revenue interests, in the form of the 'guideline market value', published by the government, in accordance with the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. This value is determined by a Central Valuation Committee, with powers to review it periodically.
The unfortunate part, in spite of all these, however, is that the government has not given finality to this value, and has on the other hand, most shockingly, created an ‘under-valuation cell (under the Dept of Revenue)’, very clearly it would seem to provide for arbitrary extortion of underhand money from property purchasers, leading to the 'stamps and registration department' gaining the dubious distinction of topping the list of government offenders on “www.ipaidabribe.com”.
This project is an exercise to bring on the needed pressure on the political bosses, hopefully in co-ordination with other civil society organisations, to effect the necessary remedial action.
Muralidhar Rao
All posts in this group
Petition being sent to minister
A petition as per attachment is being sent by to Sri S Suresh Kumar, Hon’ble Minister for Law, Govt of Karnataka, in the coming week. If he continues to hold the portfolio (assuming he continues as a minister), an attempt will be made to meet him soon.
The under-valuation extortion racket
My flat, part of a multi-storied complex of 124 flats, located in Koramangala, was registered on 16/02/05. From about a year after registration, many of us owners started receiving notices from the 'under-valuation cell' of the Dept of Revenue, GoK, alleging under-valuation in the assessment of stamp duty payable.
Praja.in comment guidelines
Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!
Recent comments in this project