The report linked below
http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/May32009/city20090503133950.asp
makes public a party political strategy saying how the GoK ruling party MLAs want to make sure they get more seats in the BBMP elections by increasing the no of wards. Something which the previous coalition govt also might have also done. But the article does not go beyond typical polticial reporting to take up any analysis.
From the public agenda viewpoint the GoK is bound to hold elections to uphold democracy and provide access to political representatives in an immediate and expedient manner to provide responsiveness and to remedy grievances listen to basic needs and redress the same in Bengaluru.
As a result of the 2-1/2 years delay in holding elections even as per the SC ruling the Ahdbad Mun Corp case of Oct 2005
If the politicians will follow the way of their predecessors even in the face of strictures from the highest court and contempt cases will the top buraeucrats of UDD, GoK who are expected to be committed to the defence of the constittuion of India give them sound counsel to not delay the elections any further ?
Will they be accountable as in the case of elections where Mr Manivannan says the buck stops with him (as below)
mysore.praja.in/discuss/forums/2009/04/voter-lists-issues-and-possible-fraud#comment-13921
The Chief Secy of the state is where the buck stops in the case of Presidents rule (6 months) but even during that period BBMP elections were stalled
We seriously need to discuss how to make the bureaucrat accountable!
Next big Tamasha 'Operation BBMP elections'?
PA sir
It will be in the fitness of things if the salient features of the High court orders are summarised and posted; this may help prajas to offer their valuable remarks because any comment made may atrract contempt of court scenario. If the High court order has dealt with the modus operandi of holding elections for BBMP after taking into consideration the recently increased 47 wards (earlier we had 100 wards) also, then government will not be eligible to increase the number of wards further. I don't know what the position is, may be some light can be thrown on this and other sensitive points included in the HC order..
Just because of bunch of ruling party MLAs are demanding increase in number of wards with a political motive, government cannot go against the HC order and increase the number of wards and invite strictures/orders for contempt of court.
will there be a summary revision of electoral rolls once again for BBMP elections and at what cost? Missing voters syndrome is still haunting the minds of citizens. It will be better for the civil society to involve itself in a more proactive manner and have a say through their participatory democracy approach. Otherwise, if we allow things to deteriorate further, we will be living in a paradise of fools.
- Vasanth Mysoremath
Didn't get it - mixing up?
Sorry PA, but didn't get what was your key point there. You started with attack on local MLAs, then moved on to accountability for the delay in local elections. Who is responsible for conducting local elections - that part is not clear. Are local MLAs delaying it, or are public servants responsible?
Babus are more or less immune from liability (refer our past posts on Lokayukta powers) procedures, but what was the point you are trying to make here - 1) how to make babus accountable, or 2) local elections are long due for Bangalore.
Not trying to criticize your intent, you seem like a knowledgeable person, perhaps some education for us on these may be good
Don't assume we know the fine legal details that you may be skilled in. So please share more, and enlighten us.
bureaucracy be made accountable
Hi all,
Thanks for your response.
Let me make my point clear
GoK should hold BBMP elections as per the HC directions without making any more changes in the number of wards, laws for Bengaluru or any other issues. the HC also already allowed delays in three cases for various reasons:
Blr (BBMP) is in competition with Hyd’bad (GHMC) which also has no elected council but there is an HC case in AP HC also for the same.
So now with the current moves of the MLAs to increase BBMP wards to 200, my point is will better counsel prevail and will the bureaucrats convince the ruling party to conduct elections without fail or face contempt of court.
While in the current Lok Sabha 2009 Code of Conduct phase they should not allow overt party poltical manipulations to occur. They did not even ensure elections themselves during presidents rule in Oct 2007 to May 2008 before Karnataka Assembly elections 2008, when they were more accountable .
It is really an issue of how does the buck stop with bureaucrats? since they are more or less immune from public pressure and are accountable to only the Politicos and not necessarily the Public except maybe in the sp case of Presidents rule and code of conduct. So will the Public ever be in a position to impose this accountability?
No Sir, Ceaser's wife is above suspicion...
PA Sir,
Yes, this is the scenario with regard to our Babus (even typing the spelling of bureaucrats is a pain) because they are the masters of ceremonies and have an excellent knowledge as to how to bend like Beckham without getting enmeshed or embroiled on both counts - political and public.
God bless the four pillars of democracy.
Oft repeated - Time to make a change we want to see. Step in..
-Vasanth Mysoremath