Can we move to make Bangalore either autonomous or as Union Territories

I am grateful to Tarle for inspiring me to write this. Some ex-CMs in the past did express their desire to transform Bangalore into a Singapore. What made Singapore what it is today, a role model for all cities and countries? It got its freedom around the same time as India and at that time it was poorer than us. It had two very great advantages - Being a City State, it was small ("Small Is Beautiful") and much easier to manage. It was ruled by a benevolent despot who had great vision, sense, commitment and integrity and there was very little politicking due to there being Lee. Perhaps, the second factor, benevolent despots might not happen here, but the first - small size can definitely be created - in the form of Union Territories or City States or autonomous. They will have to cease to be State Capitals and ideally speaking, they must be run like an efficient corporate, may be like Infosys whose campus competes with Singapore in the way it is planned and maintained. We have seen this actually happening - how small is more efficient - in our Union Territories - Goa, Pondicherry, Delhi with their low taxes, so low that people from other States used to flock to these areas when buying vehicles, etc. Are there other reasons why Union Territories are better than State Governments? How could they manage with lower taxes? Was the central govt. subsidising the deficit or were these UTs had less expenditure?