Skip to Content

Worrisome aspects of Modi Sarkar's functioning

560 users have liked.

While I had some reservations about Narendra Modi, largely from the perspective of his not having followed "Raj Dharma" post the Gujarat riots, I was welcoming of his government coming to power, or more specifically the defeat of the corrupt and ineffective Congress government. My other apprehension was whether the government will pay enough attention to environmental issues in its pursuit of GDP growth, even while appreciating the fact that growth will necessarily impact the environment, the challenge essentially being to keep the damage to the minimum.

While it may be too early yet to pass judgements on these aspects, my assessment at this stage will allow for a 4 out of 10 rating for the government's performance.

But, what I had not quite bargained for is its sluggishness (may not be the best of words to describe it) with regard to economic issues, brought out in the following excerpts (with the latest being listed first, and in that order, and the emphasis addition being mine) from columns/ articles, published in news-papers of fair standing, which overall compelled me to start this blog, for whatever it's worth:

1) Article in Business Standard (for the full text, click here):
The Centre looks set to seek a compensation of around Rs 426 crore from Swiss food major Nestle over the alleged damages caused by Maggi noodles to Indian consumers.

At a time when Nestle India is awaiting a verdict from the Bombay High Court in its case against the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), it might now have to fight another legal battle.

- - - The development comes within days of Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan telling the media that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had asked his Cabinet colleagues to "maintain decorum" on the Maggi issue. Also, some ministers in the government have been critical of FSSAI's Maggi recall order. While some have cited international investors' nervousness in the matter - without wanting to be named - Food Processing Minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal has been more open. She had earlier said the Maggi incident had led to an environment of fear.

Most strange attitude, even as the government is supposedly going all out to attract fresh investment.

2) Column by Shankkar Aiyar in the New Indian Express (for the full text, cick here):
The citizens’ quest is not a romantic notion but a response to the parade of inefficiency in public services and wastage/theft witnessed and paid for by taxpayers.

On Wednesday, the Lok Sabha voted to allow government to spend an additional Rs 40,821 crore. Of this, Rs 11,116.76 crore—four times the amount allocated for crop insurance—will be used to write off losses of Prasar Bharati. Rs 12,721 crore will be used to recapitalise banks. The fact that profits of private banks are higher than all PSU banks and that the market cap of top five private banks is more than that of all PSU banks is evidence of the magnitude of malaise. Add Rs 800 crore for loss-making Air India. Over half of Rs 40,821 crore is for bailouts. Wednesday also saw the government clear the restructuring of BSNL—which has not reported profits since 2009—and of loss-making MTNL. On Thursday, the PM reviewed the power sector. Over Rs 75,000 crore of bank depositors’ money lent to companies is in jeopardy as nearly 45,000 MW of power is at risk as SEBs are losing Rs 232 crore a day in leakage and theft. A bailout for SEBs is inevitable.

The unstated question that taxpayers and citizens are agitated about is what about corrective measures, a stop loss on losses? In a nutshell, the Government of India borrows around $250 million a day or Rs 1,600 crore/day to fund the gap between income and expenditure. It also loses nearly $70 million a day to wastage, leakage and theft.

- - - Modi Sarkar came to power promising minimum government, maximum governance. India continues to be detained. On Independence Day, Modi must reboot his campaign for minimum government to deliver maximum governance.

The author goes on to spell out the way forward too. But, the question that arises is how come the government, with all the expertise at its command, is continuing to perpetuate the public sector inefficiency and mediocrity.

3) Column by Mihir S Sharma, in the Business Standard (for the full text, click here):
Mr Modi is solidly and intelligently putting into place the structures that will change the nature of India’s liberal democracy forever, and make it something that he, his organisation, and many of his voters will be more comfortable with.
Consider this: which are the only two major administrative or institutional reforms that Mr Modi’s government is pushing? I’ll tell you: the judicial accountability law and the monetary policy committee. In other words, things they see as disempowering that pesky and uncontrollable Raghuram Rajan, and disempowering those irritating Teesta Setalvad- and Greenpeace-loving judges. On any of the dozen institutional reforms more urgent than the monetary policy committee, there’s complete silence. No greater independence for regulators. No independence for public-sector companies, no privatisation of PSU banks.

Doesn't need much elaboration, I guess - worrisome from both economic and Socio-political angle.

I'll keep adding my observations, as we go along. May be other Prajagalu (open to everyone) would like to add their comments too.

Muralidhar Rao



Abraham Kuruvilla's picture

Worrisome aspects of Modi Sarkar's functioning

215 users have liked.

Valuable observations!

Keep at it Murli, you need to keep a close vigit to see that this sarkar does not slip trhrogh with dangerous ordinances.

warm regards



srinidhi's picture

2 out of 10 only

213 users have liked.

2 is my score for the governament..from the many promises it initially started off with and where we have come to..

Crude is trading below 50$ but the fuel prices is still around 70 Rs (it was 80Rs when crude was 100$) this is the reaping time for the oil companies..a.k.a Reliance etc is it?

Everything seems to be fluff..and on charcha only!

xs400's picture

Now fight for freedom from Modi Sarkar? Quit India Movement?

229 users have liked.

"I told you so..."

I prefer honest non-politicians anyday.  Willful misgovernance is a very serious issue.

No. Signore Rahul will do the same.

And the upcoming BBMP "elections" - I guess I'm the only clueless person here, there must be some good reason why all the honorable citizens of namma citi have not revolted against the same old corrupt candidates standing for elections. I expect that there will be more prose on the failing infrastructure in the coming years.

murali772's picture

lot more needed

211 users have liked.

The conflict of interest in Swaraj’s case is a symbol of a clash breaking out now on many fronts, between old and new India. The old India is an India of connections, where who you are and how much you can get ahead depend on who you know. But the new India is one of aspiration and upward mobility, a meritocratic order where everyone has a chance and fairness and transparency are assumed.

The Vyapam scam in BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh is a much more corrosive instance of this clash, as the undermining of a meritocratic order has been linked to a rash of mysterious deaths.

The dramatic elevation of the son of a tea-seller to India’s current PM was a major victory for the new India. But Prime Minister Narendra Modi must now transcend politics-as-usual to enable millions of young Indians to be upwardly mobile as well, instead of being choked by a corrupt system. Challenging the old order may be difficult. But that is the promise Modi made, enabling NDA to defeat UPA. It’s going to be the promise NDA will increasingly be assessed by. Taking potshots at UPA or being in permanent campaign mode is subject to the law of diminishing returns.

More so because it will be increasingly said that India under NDA is no different from India under UPA.

For the full text of  the editorial piece in the ToI, click here.

The people voted in the government with a lot of hope. Sadly, it's been a let down so far. But, yes, in certain areas like Railways, Defense, etc, there are indications that things are changing for the better. One lives on hope that the others too will pick up sooner than later.

Muralidhar Rao
idontspam's picture

Freedom? You have it? Where?

213 users have liked.

The citizens of namma city can vote all they want but unless the rank and file of BBMP can be held accountable for performing their job change is going to be very little. The way work is distributed, the lack of merit & expertise, the value system, interference for benefit from politicians, division of labour which discourages accountability, old town planning and other acts governing them, non implementation of the 74th amendment and many more needs a long hard look. The fivefurcation recommended by the govt apointed committee has been diluted even while it was being made to favour the current dispensation and there is good chance the poiticians will ignore studied suggestions and make their own plan of 3 Bangalores. Its a long hard battle that needs to be fought. And what freedom are you guys celebrating? 

murali772's picture

wrong number

197 users have liked.

IDS avare' - all of what you have talked about is for "Namma Karnataka governamentu" to do, or undo. Modi sarkar can help little in these matters.

Perhaps, you should have started another blog for that.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

lacking in focus on purposive governance

215 users have liked.

Why visit foreign countries asking multinationals to “Make in India”, and then subject them to the sort of treatment meted out to Nestle? You are gaining a reputation for talking big about “minimum government, maximum governance” and then doing the opposite. You refuse to rein in over-hasty, arbitrary food inspectors and tax officials, apparently for fear of being called pro-multinational.

Foreign companies now want to buy insurance against arbitrary penalties for which your tax authorities are becoming famous. But Bloomberg reports that all top global insurance companies that offer such insurance in other countries have refused to do so in India, saying Indian tax behavior is too erratic and unpredictable.

Your new spectrum sharing and trading policy is replete with red tape. Why? Are you terrified that a liberal policy will be portrayed by opponents as another 2G scam? Have you no self-confidence or conviction?

For the full text of the open letter to NaMo by Swaminathan Aiyar in the Sunday ToI, click here.

Exactly as the author has exhorted, NaMo needs to focus on purposive governance to establish himself as a strong leader worthy of re-election in 2019, rather than be distracted by Bihar elections. The question is would he heed the exhortation?

Muralidhar Rao
idontspam's picture

I was responding to the

214 users have liked.

I was responding to the question on upcoming BBMP elections... which was BJP BTW. So they havent exactly proven anything locally either.

kbsyed61's picture

Pseudo Nationalism!

216 users have liked.

Murali Sir,

None of us even the worst baiter of PM would have thought the public opinion would take a 180 degree so soon. It is only 18 months, charge sheet is already filled with highest allegations of impropriety, scams and dithering on public policies. It only confirms the hollowness of vision and direction of BJP led govt at the center. 

It is the BJP that disappoints me more than any other party. Every time they come to power, people like me at least hoped that their declared nationalistic instincts would resurrect the institutions that would guide the nation in establishing the rule of law and equal opportunities/access to all the citizens. They squandered the opportunity in Vajpayee led govt center, then in Karnataka they were clueless against election funded by the ill-gotten money from mining barons of Bellary republic. Now with the brute majority in loksabha, they will have no excuse.

The most worrying part is the way govt is going after the citizens who used to stand up and ask questions. BJP doesn't understand that it was the hard work of ordinary citizens who exposed the mega scams in UPA regime. The RTI act, which the UPA had passed become their last nail in the coffin. You will agree with me that the prominence of this own PRAJA activities were result of the RTI queries that members file from time to time.

It is known in government circles that govt is collecting background information on all those who file these RTIs regularly. It seems they would like to go after these humble souls.

The story doesn't end there. You ask any RTI activist, since the new govt came to power, there is dramatic stoppage to flow of information from govt departments. Govt departments are not responding to RTI queries.

You will not believe that, it has been more than six months, PMO, ministry of railways, SWR Hubli and Urban Development Ministry, are yet to respond to our RTI queries.

If PM can not ensure a fair RTI regime, how can he ensure - NA KHAUOONGA, NA KISIKO KHANE DOONGA.

xs400's picture

Recall or Impeachment?

199 users have liked.

I hope our founding fathers made provisions for recall or impeachment, since all they did was copy-paste from elsewhere. Amazingly, while everyone wants the latest cars and version of software, no one want  progressive laws or amendments, it seems.

murali772's picture

too little, too slow, and a lot of status quo

180 users have liked.

In August 2013, Credit Suisse (CS), a global investor, reckoned that 10 large Indian conglomerates had borrowed a staggering Rs 6.4 lakh crore. This was nearly three times India’s defence budget at the time.

Each of these companies didn’t even generate enough cash to pay interest on what they’d borrowed. Nevertheless, CS hoped that by 2014-15, many of these companies, heavily invested in the power sector, would generate 15,000MW of electricity and pay back banks.

Well, tough love. Apart from Reliance ADA’s Sasan and a project by Tata Power, everything is stalled. Technically, groups like Lanco, GVK and GMR are bust: in the US, they’d have to apply for Chapter 11 protection, their managements ousted and assets sold off cheap.

Not so here, where state-owned banks continue to ‘restructure’ loans: “Oh, you’ve lost Rs 100 crore of our money? Here, take another Rs 200 crore.” And so it goes. Banks are riddled by graft, kickbacks are routine, and no promoter is ever broke. Meanwhile, their companies are bust and shareholders bereft of their chaddi-banians.

For the full text of the column by Abheek Barman in the Sunday ToI, click here.

Last week, talking to a senior manager of a nationalised bank (who had just retired), who I have been banking with from long, he told me about how many things have been going wrong with his bank in recent times. He specifically mentioned the case of a senior lady manager, with a brilliant track record, being asked for a bribe of a few crores to be inducted onto the bank board. Aparently, she was outraged, and quit the bank, to be readily absorbed by a private bank at a senior level.

Now, though all of it is heresay as far as I am concerned, there's no reason for me not to to believe the senior manager, either. And, going by the reports of the NPA's that our nationalised banks have been accumulating, the senior manager's talk begins to gain currency.

I'll still say that Lanco, GVK and GMR are fairly competent business houses. The problem they are facing apparently arose out of their tendency to go overboard with their projects, which is the impression one gets seeing the new New Delhi or Mumbai airport terminals, as compared to the largely functional ambience of the Bengaluru airport, which was originally built by the Siemens/ L&T led consortium. Apparently, the nationalised banks backing them were indulgent in such pursuits, whereas private banks in their place would have been a lot more prudent.

The moral of the story very simply is for the government to disinvest to the level of retaining just 26% equity holding, which is good enough to ensure that their conformity to overall policy directives. There have been some moves by the government of recent along these lines, more specifically in the matter of induction of talent at board level from private sector. But, they all seem to be too slow and too little.

Similar is the sense one gets from a reading of the column by Sadanand Dhume in today's ToI (accessible here), some excerpts from which are reproduced below:

Thus far, Modi’s approach to the economy has been timid and lacking in any obvious conviction. His over-reliance on the bureaucracy suggests a prime minister who has yet to outgrow a chief ministerial style of administration. His failure to privatise even perennially loss-making public sector companies such as Air India betrays a strange comfort with the status quo.

Muralidhar Rao
kbsyed61's picture

Murali Sir,The situation in

219 users have liked.

Murali Sir,

The situation in infrastructure is far complex than just "Privatization" mantra that you keep chanting in every post. Privitization will happen in every sector, if not today, in next 5-10 yrs. If privatization was the panacea than ENRON project in Rantnagiri wouldn't have been a failure. Even in US, the privatization experiments are still in churning to produce a viable model. It failed in California in last decade. New experiment is govt service provider owns the transmission and distribution channels, private parties supply the energy. Let's see how successful they will be in after a decade.

i admire you for the spin you have given on the story quoted in your post - "Cant' pay 100 crs, Borrow 200 Crs.".

The story was about how the Corporate India who you never tired of hailing as the saviors of Indian economy, is dragging the country into a deep pit. The article was about how deep Corporate India is in debt? Article is about how worse the bank's NPA situation has become?

This is the essence of that article you quoted.

"...So, why did Moody’s downgrade India’s growth projection from 7.3% to 7% last week? Why is lending by banks, a proxy for growth, limping at 8.4%, the lowest in 20 years?

But let that pass. Folks who move billions of dollars across the globe in search of returns don’t buy countries; they buy shares in companies. And India’s corporate sector is up to its waist in, well, its own poop.."
If the numbers given in the article are correct, Steel Industry owes staggering Rs. 4.2 lakh Crorers, Infrastructure Sectors owes Rs. 3.2 lakh Crorers.
In the same article, you will find this paragraph - "...inn August 2013, Credit Suisse (CS), a global investor, reckoned that 10 large Indian conglomerates had borrowed a staggering Rs 6.4 lakh crore. This was nearly three times India’s defence budget at the time..."
You are right, this wouldn't have been possible without the govt's largesses, public sector banks becoming a willing partner in the crime and the politicians special interest. Latest was Pm's nudging SBI to help a industry house.
The point this article substantiates is, corporate India loves protection, never apologetic about govt's large hearted generosity (at the cost of small entrepreneurs) and are biggest supporters of flawed taxation regime. Did we ever wonder why corporate India won't lobby for progressive regimes like GST, AADHAR?
Did any corporate house ever asked their peers to clear the dues? Kingfisher owes about Rs. 7000 Crorers? Amount that can fully fund the "Namma Railu" project?
In contrast look at how our govt banks work for you and me.
In 2006 I purchased a house. None of the so called private banks ready to finance me. Finally Canfin financed it. Until last year I had paid each and every EMI, though at times I had delayed. For some reason, in 2014 I missed on 3 payments. In Dec 2014, they served me a notice that due to the non-payment of EMIs my house is being treated as NPA and is being listed for auction. Ordinary souls like me did what every humble souls do. Paid all the dues and got it removed from auction list. Till that notice I had paid back almost 90% of the loan amount along with interest.
Mallyas, Adanis, AMbanis can default on lakhs fo crorers, but you and me can't default on few thousands.
murali772's picture

government's role review long overdue

198 users have liked.

Syedbhai - for the nth time, can I request you not to attribute the talk of "privatization as the panacea" to me, please? I too have a few fears about privatisation, and I have included them too in my listing accessible here. Whatever, as I have stated in the post itself, I believe that all of them are beginning to get addressed, or that they will get addressed, sooner than later. Besides, my fears over continuation of government as a producer of goods and provider of services is far greater.
Did we ever wonder why corporate India won't lobby for progressive regimes like GST, AADHAR?

Wherever did you get this impression? Last time when you brought up this too, I had pointed out to you that you were mistaken. But, you keep repeating the same thing, without any substantiation. A few days back, I had in fact come upon a statement by a known industry representative, lamenting the lack of resolve on the part of the government in moving the GST bill fast enough. Had I known that you were still harbouring the misconception, I'd have sent the link to the report to you. Google and check them out for yourselves if you so wish.

Latest was Pm's nudging SBI to help a industry house. - - Kingfisher owes about Rs 7000 Crorers

The fanciful ways of Lanco, GVK and GMR, as also KingFisher, were all funded by the PSU banks. And, that's also why the correction is not happening yet. And, all of these are traditional businessmen who believe in 'exploiting opportunities', unmindful of collateral damages their pursuits may cause. That's where correction is required. But, the correction will not happen through nationalisation, or retaining the status quo, because the PSU's were (and are) themselves bigger defaulters on these scores even.

The loss to the tax payer on account of KingFisher is a one-time Rs 7,000 cr. But, on account of Air-India (not a day passes without it being in the news for some wrong reason or the other), it is some Rs 10,000 cr per annum, in perpetuity. Also, if KingFisher had been funded by private banks, and it had closed down, the losses would have been to the account of the shareholders, and not the tax payer. In the first place, between the shareholders and private bankers, they wouldn't have allowed it to sink to such depths, even if it sank for whatever reasons.

Besides all of these, it should interest you to note that when the private players came into the picture in the distribution of power in Delhi, the Supreme court reversed its earlier order with a view to bring about financial discipline in the sector (check here). When DESU was in the picture earlier, the court obviously thought it was futile.

Moral of the story very plain is for the government to concentrate on its role as the facilitator, regulator, and controller (where essential), rather than continuing as a player. I am surprised I am having to go on repeating all of these time after time.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

disastrous route

205 users have liked.

Delhi doubled subsidies to 234 centrally run public sector units (PSUs) over three years to about Rs 1.73 lakh crore ($30 billion), but a new analysis of their finances indicates a 4% fall in profits at constant prices and—with inflation factored in—zero growth.

The subsidies are enough to fund the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme (MGNREGA) for six financial years or pay for India’s defence purchases for three years.

- - - PSUs may sicken and lose out to private competitors, but they continue to be born—contrary to the general expectation that government should not be in businesses where existing private businesses are doing well: As many as 56 centrally run PSUs are being set up in different sectors, according to the survey.

Unlike its previous policy on disinvestment during its six-year regime beginning 1998, the 2014 poll manifesto of the BJP does not say anything about public-sector disinvestment or privatisation.

- - - Two companies—BSNL and Air India—account for more than 60% of the Rs 20,000-crore loss showed by 71 PSUs in 2013-14.

For the full text of the report in IndiaSpend, click here.

This is nothing short of disastrous

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

need for re-inventing NaMo govt outlook

232 users have liked.

By no way does this mean that the BJP is going to lose every election in the months ahead. But it does emphasise the fact that the old winning formula of 2014 is now on the wane, if not over. And the party, notwithstanding its old guard rebels, would be better served focusing on making Modi, the PM, more acceptable and successful than chase grandiose political visions of resurrecting a revisionist model of nationhood.

For the full text of the column by Mr Pranab Dhal Samanta, in the Economic Times, click here.

A well written column, indeed. Comparing with Congress mis-rule is long past the sell-by date.

Muralidhar Rao
amithpallavoor's picture

According to Bhakts who have

216 users have liked.

According to Bhakts who have pecuniary interests in defending Namo, this is a canard and an attempt by Congress to defame Modi.  

The media is hand in glove as well! 


murali772's picture

more than disappointing; almost tragic

204 users have liked.

It should be obvious to most that this government, contrary to the myth supporters had created, does not believe in disinvestment of state-owned companies. It has no intent of meeting even the disinvestment targets it had set itself for fiscal reasons. Quite the contrary, it seems to believe that with the right bureaucratic intervention, public-sector companies can be turned around. Certainly, some companies can. But it would take a peculiar obtuseness to argue that in some areas, disinvestment cannot be a good thing. The opportunity cost in terms of finances and human capital of the state running things that are unnecessary for it to run are still huge. Yet there remains an immense 1970s-style commitment to the public sector in areas of production.

On the other hand, the two areas where you would expect the public to take a lead role, health and education, are on a galloping privatisation trajectory. Much of this is due to state failure. But a lot of the failure was almost deliberately induced to create opportunities for politically connected education entrepreneurs. Just the list of politicians who run educational institutions will point to this fact. But whatever the political-economy story, we still have a curiously schizophrenic view of the private sector’s role in this area. On the one hand, we want it to bear the load of state failure: It should perform the public sector’s role.

- - - So all the things that a public system should ideally produce — law and order, basic social rights like health and education — are increasingly privatised but with ad hominem and corrupt regulation. It is a good thing that this government ideologically does not believe in defeatism about the state. But it has done little to restore clarity on the roles of the state and the market, the public and the private.

For the full text of the must read column (emphasis added by me) by the redoubtable Pratap Bhanu Mehta in the New Indian Express, click here.

If this is what we are seeing after one and a half years of policy charting by the likes of Arvind Panagaria, Arvind Subramaniam, etc, it is not just disappointing, but, I would even say, totally tragic. If the Modi sarkar is not prepared to take their advice, it'd be best they quit, rather than ruin their reputations.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

attempting the near impossible?

202 users have liked.

He (NaMo) is an energetic and wise reformer of government processes, clearances, regulatory systems. But, he isn't a liberaliser in the sense of getting the government out of more aspects of businesses. To that extent, he is a Chinese-style statist and his promise of less government, more governance needs to be re-read as "more government, but better government."

Plenty of evidence is quoted to support this argument, the latest being his getting the state involved directly in the start-up economy by putting up a fund. Or his refusal to pick up the thread from Mr Vajpayee's NDA on privatisation. But most importantly, there is impatience with his government's approach to global trade agreements, seen as even more stridently protectionist than the UPA's. This is denying India opportunities offered by new global and regional alliances like the Trans Pacific Pact and Apac, both of which would have been within its reach in Barack Obama's last year. But, there is no movement, given that the new policy now seems to be to the left of JNU and the right of RSS. This is sobering down global enthusiasm for India.

For the full text (emphasis added is by me) of the column by Shekhar Gupta in the Business Standard, click here.

So, is he under some delusion that the Air-India's and BSNL's can be turned around, the way they are currently managed? That being a near impossible task, is he at least prepared to look at Singapore's Temasek kind of an arrangement, ensuring professional management, strongly advocated by a number of economists, including Mr Shankkar Aiyer (check his column in the Indian Express, accessible here)? If he doesn't, can the country continue to shoulder the enormous non-performing burden that our PSU's have largely become?

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Contradictions galore

218 users have liked.

The following excerpts from a ToI editorial piece (full text - emphasis added by me -  accessible here)

NDA’s approach is characterised by energy but its instinct remains similar to that of its UPA predecessors. To illustrate, there is a distrust of market mechanisms which shows up in the form of price controls and interference in private contracts. To this, add the tendency to have blind faith in public sector companies which forces government to craft policy in a way that prioritises its companies rather than the economy as a whole. This shows up in the form of endless rounds of bank recapitalisations and airline bailouts when the nature of ownership is the root cause of the problem.

as also the following excerpts from a column by Sri P B Mehta in the New Indian Express (full text - emphasis added by me - accessible here)

Contradictions in the government are still muddying its identity. This is a government where swagger often overshadows truth. But it is difficult not to see the contradictions. On institutions, Modi ran on the slogan of minimum government; but the reigning ideology is that he is a big believer in government.

say it all.

Not many people seem to be able to read Modi-ji's mind. Well, we live on hope.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Nehruvian Socialism here to stay?

223 users have liked.

Nehruvianism can broadly be defined in terms of its four key pillars: hard secularism, social liberalism, socialism (more fairly, mixed economy), non-alignment and internationalism. Which ones of these does Mr Modi look at odds with?

- - - Now run your eye over Narendra Modi’s interview to The Wall Street Journal. It’s been almost four decades since we heard an Indian prime minister make such a strong case for a mixed economy and the public sector. And Mr Modi has a track record. Even when Mr Vajpayee was feverishly selling off public sector companies, Gujarat did not privatise any of its own PSUs. We know that Mr Modi spent a great deal of energy and used the state’s clout to support these companies — particularly in the oil and gas sector, notably Gujarat Gas Ltd and GSPC. Mr Vajpayee even tried to get rid of Air India, besides the big oil companies. But Mr Modi is letting even Hindustan Photo Films be.

- - - Narendra Modi’s loyalists say he has no personal issue with Nehru. It is just that his worldview is exactly to the contrary of Nehru’s. If so, we are still looking for evidence of it in his economic and foreign policies.

For the full text (emphasis added by me) of the column by Mr Shekhar Gupta, in the Business Standard, click here.

So, Nehruvian Socialism here to stay? Not quite a happy thought, as far as I am concerned.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Squandering of an opportunity to usher in "acchae din"

237 users have liked.

Things have never looked better for the ruling combine. The primary political opposition has been scattered, leaving no credible challenger on the national stage. The economy has never been better since 2011 or so, with a recovery clearly on the cards. It may be a weak recovery, but the combination of improved corporate results (if we set aside the banks, that is) and the prospect of a good monsoon have sent the stock market soaring — though still not to the levels that prevailed a year ago. If the government wanted to seize the moment and push for the changes that would deliver faster growth, now would be a better time than any. The economy can bear the shocks of change, and there is enough political space for the government to take calculated risks. That is why it is so disappointing to read the comments by the prime minister — who seems to have turned his face away from the business of introducing serious reform.

- - - On state-owned companies too, Mr Modi has signalled that there will be no real change. One must ask why, when so many government companies have no financial, economic or other rationale. The example that stares everyone in the face is Air India, which if it were in the private sector would long ago have met the fate of Kingfisher Airlines. Ditto with the government-owned hotel chain. It is distressing to get such status quo views from a prime minister who is in the rare position of being able to lead change, but who argues instead that the experts have failed to tell him what ‘big bang’ reforms he should introduce.

- - - It has been said that India will do the right thing only after it has tried all the alternatives — and only when a crisis pushes the country to the realisation that there are no options. With the government expecting good times to return, the signals coming through are of a new complacency. In which case…Oh, for a crisis!

For the full text (emphasis added by me) of the column by Mr T N Ninan, in the Business Standard, click here.

On the one hand, you have economists/ columnists like T N Ninan, Swaminathan Aiyer, Surjit Bhalla, Sadanand Dhume, Shekhar Gupta, Ashok Malik etc, repeatedly advocating the liberalist route that the Vajpayee government had quite successfully followed to achieve a real "India Shining" (even if it lost the elections, on account of other factors), and on the other, you also have the likes of Arvind Panagariya, Arvind Subramanian, etc, within the government itself, and whose line of thinking was also supposed to be on similar lines. For all of that, when the PM continues with Nehruvian Socialism, as graphically brought out by Shekhar Gupta (read my post immediately above), and then goes on to say "experts have failed to tell him what ‘big bang’ reforms he should introduce", it's indeed puzzling. All in all, the PM appears to be squandering of an opportunity to usher in real "acchae din" - truly disappointing.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

oh, for big-bang reforms !

222 users have liked.

By claiming that big-bang reforms did not exist, that they were impossible, and that he had already carried them out – all while expanding the reach of the state – the PM forces observers to take a critical and disbelieving stance. Two years in, Mr Modi is certainly working on improving India – but transforming India is not even on the horizon yet.

For the full text (emphasis added by me) of the column by Mihir S Sharma in the Business Standard, click here.

Further, the futility of attempting to turn around many of the PSU's has been brought out in the excellent Financial Express editorial accessible here, as also in all of the posts in the blog. As such, it is quite perplexing as to why NaMo, one of whose oft-repeated mantra's was "less government, more governance", is persisting with them.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

RBI too to become a caged parrot?

200 users have liked.

The first repercussions of the impending departure of Raghuram Rajan from the Reserve Bank of India could now be visible -- and it looks like those who argued the independence of India’s central bank was under threat may have been right.

- - - The fact that the government has chosen to ignore the obvious means of recapitalizing banks is also revealing. The state-owned banking sector shouldn't be bailed out using RBI funds, of course -- but not by using tax money either. Instead, it should be guided towards privatization, and funds for recapitalizing the best banks should be raised from the markets. But movement on this is slow. Modi himself doesn’t seem too sympathetic to privatization.

India’s Prime Minister came into office promising “maximum governance, minimum government.” That’s what both the RBI and the banking sector need, not renewed state control.

For the full text (emphasis added by me) of the column by Mihir Sharma, in Bloomberg View, click here.

Says it all - doesn't give a comfortable feeling.

Muralidhar Rao
Sajith's picture

AAP style Praja

218 users have liked.

Shri Murali,

Am logging in to this forum after many years and surprised to see that this has become a Kejriwal style attack Modi/BJP forum. There are no suggestions for imprvement. If Modi apologies for 2002, the infra for Bangalore will not change magically.


amithpallavoor's picture

Modi's economic policies are

206 users have liked.

Modi's economic policies are a departure from Vajpayee's thrust on privitization of public sector behemoths. I do not want get into the details of  A la Damaad affair as regards privitization during Vajapayee's regime. I would not want digress and discuss Ranjan Bhattacharya's faffing around with PSU assets or Vadra's shenanigans. We could maybe do it on a different post.

In fac,t this government has  been more Nehruvian than UPA two with their regressive indirect taxation measures such as Swach Bharath cess and Krishi Kalyan. Indirect taxes are regressive and fuel inflation. This is a basic priniciple of Economics.

This is pretty much against Modi's pre poll adage of Maximum Governance and Minimum Government.

There has been no attempt to bite the bullet on bringing in more people under the direct tax net. Public sector divestment and spectrum auction would help bridge the fiscal deficit in the short to medium term. I would ignore people who build citadels around their favourite political czars. and digress to castigating someone who genuinely wishes to critique Modi Sarkar as an AAP minion. 

This post on FB would enable such people gain some knowlegde around Economics from two very erduite individuals. This was written by Govind Rao an authority on public finance in response to a post from one Mr. Vasudevan. I wish, I was as learned as these two individuals.

This is with reference to the flip flop that GOI had around Raghurajan issue.

"Dear Mr. Vasudevan, I do not think sensible people will raise anyone to a "citadel"as you describe. We are concerned with issues, not people. Nor is it appropriate to describe some as an output from Lucas- Sargent factory. Raghu is not. He did not do his Ph. D in Chicago. He does not work in the "Chicago School"" but in the Booth School of Finance. I my view (which will come out in a column in Financial Express on Tuesday) he did some outstanding tasks as the Governor for the people of India. Targeting consumer prices instead of wholesale prices is important. At a time when the household sector's financial savings is just about 7.7 per cent of GDP and the public sector preempts more than 9 per cent for its spending, reduction in interest rates would only result in monetising the deficits. The second important contribution is asking to commercial banks to undertake asset quality review which brought out the extent of bad loan problem and cronyism in the system. I have worked with Dr. Rangarajan closely for over 10 years. (He was the Chairman of NIPFP where I was the Director and I was a member of the Economic Advisory Council to the PM for 8 years where he was the Chairman). Perhaps, many would not know that it was Rangarajan and the PM who brought Raghu and his views on the interest rate policy are similar to Raghu's. It is true, Raghu need not have spoken oin matters which are not in the RBI's remit, but I will not brand him as a Friedmaniac or a Lucasist."

This was in response to another post by Rajendran Vasudevan, which went as follows:

"Dear sir that is very pertinent in so far as India's practice of appointing people in critical finance bodies goes too...Relevant updated skill sets is certainly at a premium!! There are only two sides to the RRR supporting or opposing crowd: sanghis and others. That is a pity...There indeed was plenty in RRR's approach to monetary policy that needed much deeper appreciation--some of them critically so. The "crowd" from the fiance fraternity for instance was out to raise to him a "citadel" beyond any reproach.. On this back drop I would like to look at the positions take by the other stalwarts, namely IG Patel,MMS and C Rangarajan. RRR on this backdrop surely comes across as a died in the wool Lucas-Sargent factory output all decked up with his newly minted DSGE??? The older men on the contrary were exemplars of sublime balance...This surely is not an attempt to take credit away from RRR for all the initiatives --even though some of them are totally flawed, which we realize from recent international experiences...The revision of fiscal-multipliers by Summers, Fatas and Blanchard through their recent bouquet of published material on this score is a case in point.. That we suffer from an acute lack of appropriate skill sets in the ambit of financial-- macro is a national shame, can not be gainsaid.."

Apart from the substantive content of what both individuals have written, I would like to emphasise to the esteemed members of the online Modi sena out there, to take a leaf out of the book of my friends, as to how to politely conduct an argument.





murali772's picture

bouquets and brick-bats in equal measure :)))

199 users have liked.

@Sajith - Where NaMo govt has been performing well (in my view of course), like Piyush Goyal-ji offering grid power to all states as much as they want at below Rs 2.50 pu (check here), and in a few other cases too, I have complimented them.

Even for AAP govt in Delhi, there have been both bouquets and brick-bats from - check here.

I have largely tried to remain impartial.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Can't understand this at all

201 users have liked.

“Reform, perform and transform” was an inspiring slogan delivered from the ramparts of Red Fort in the course of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech. However, that expectation was belied in a key area of the very same speech, when the PM spoke up for a few ailing public sector units that recorded improvements in their financial performance in the recent past. Modi’s observations on Air India, Shipping Corporation and BSNL – three companies mentioned in his speech – are unconvincing.

- - - It is not as if these companies cannot be turned around. But under government ownership, managements are unlikely to have the freedom to do so. Therefore, we have a double whammy of public companies’ value declining and government’s continued investment in them depriving it of resources in other areas. The only way out is to revive the strategic disinvestment of the Vajpayee government. Hopefully, Modi will revisit his PSU strategy. He has shown boldness in other areas, he should abandon status quo on PSUs.

For the full text of the editorial in the ToI, click here.

Can't understand this at all.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

NaMo sarcar's self-goals

191 users have liked.

“It was well within the knowledge of the of the IO [Investigative Officer] that the accused Gulab Singh has been looking at the campaign work of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in the coming election in Gujarat and that the rally as convened on 16.10.016. But, the police, for the reasons best known to them, rushed to Gujarat by flight and arrested the accused Gulab Singh from Gujarat.

This was an observation made by Metropolitan Magistrate Kishore Kumar while sending AAP legislator Gulab Singh to 14 days of judicial custody. A day later, on October 19, he was granted bail.

On October 16, Gulab was arrested in relation to an extortion case on the basis of a statement given by co-accused people in the case. The complainant had not named the Matiala legislator in his complaint, yet the Delhi police claimed Gulab was the kingpin behind the extortion racket. The court also observed that, nowhere in the First Information Report (FIR) or during the investigation had the complainant alleged that money was given to Gulab.

Last year, on August 22, Metropolitan Magistrate Gomati Manocha observed, while granting bail to AAP MLA Commando Surinder Singh, that “it has been averred that this case is actuated by Political vendetta ... Hence, the application seeking judicial custody of the accused persons hereby dismissed and the application of seeking bail of the accused Surinder Singh ... are hereby allowed.” Commando had been arrested the previous day for passing casteist remarks about an NDMC employee and was booked under eight sections of the SC and the ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

For the full text of the report (emphasis added by me) in the NewsLaundry, click here.

And, as brought out in the report, this clearly follows a pattern (rather than a few cases in isolation), obviously dictated by the NaMo sarcar. While this has been quite evident to the discerning follower of the goings on, NewsLaundry's documenting it would hopefully take it to the attention of some of the well-wishers of the Sarcar too, whom one believes the Sarcar would bother to listen to.

The Sarcar has been doing a fair amount of good work, more particularly in areas like power (under Piyush Goyal), Railways (under Suresh Prabhu), and, elsewhere too, there are indications of fresh thinking, though there's lot ways to go. But, the positive image emerging out of all of that is getting negated, and badly too, by the police-raaj let loose on the AAP lot.

Participating in a debate on the lessons that could be derived from the outstanding movie "Pink", I had commented (for the full text, click here) - "A question I have is "shouldn't the court have proceeded against the lady police officer too for filing a false complaint?" The easy pliability of the low level police officials is clearly the weakest link in our policing system, and that perhaps needs immediate attention. The question arises here once again, and fairly starkly too.

Also, we have been witnessing the rampant misuse of the SC, ST Act, across many states, some of which have come to my notice, I have commented upon here. Well, its misuse by the Police force under the Central government is plainly a new low. Perhaps, time then to take up the matter with the Law Commission.

When an AAP sympathiser brought these to my notice, I responded saying "perhaps, you could give it back to them in the same coin after gaining power in Punjab". Indeed because of all of such doings, apart from the misdeeds of its ghat-bandhan with the notorious Baadals, at least Punjab seems a goner as far as they are concerened. And, then the boots will be on AAP's feet.

All in all, the way the NaMo sarcar is going about all of these, is equivalent to losing 10-0 in a penlty shoot-out, including 5 self-goals.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

all for another Mallya to spirit away?

179 users have liked.

Public sector banks have seen nearly Rs 80,000 crore increase in gross non-performing assets (NPAs) in the three months ended September 2016. As on September 30, gross NPAs of public sector banks rose to Rs 6,30,323 crore as against Rs 5,50,346 crore by June end, an increase of Rs 79,977 crore on quarter-on-quarter basis.

For the full text of the report in the ToI, click here.

The question that arises is "Is the government going to be using the windfall gains out of the demonetisation exercise to recapitalise the PSU banks?"

Now, the noted economist, Ruchir Sharma, had, in his column in the ToI (for the full text, click here), a few days back, commented as "If India wanted to do something radical it should have taken on privatisation of a banking system in which government ownership is higher than in any other democratic nation".

As such, for all the recapitalisation of the PSU banks that the government may undertake, without the checks and balances that government divestment (I am deliberately avoiding the P-word, because of this) can bring about, what guarantee is there that, a few years down the line, another Mallya doesn't come along and scoots away with all of the money?

Demonetisation has caused immense pain, particularly to the aam aadmi, from which many may not recover even. On top of it all, if the gains are going to be squandered away by the lax ways of the PSU banks, then not only would it all not have been worth the effort, but the it would be seen as most unpardonable. Yesterday's tweet by Jayant Sinha-ji that "Air-India is on an expansion mode" is an indicator that the government still believes in the PSU's, for all of the noises to the contrary coming from the Niti Ayog (check here). All in all, it's total confusion all around.

Muralidhar Rao
MaheshK's picture

this will continue

200 users have liked.


Every political party wants PSUs so that the netas can use them for their gains. PSU banks are there for crony capitalism. Cooperative banks are no different as many are there to turn black to white for the management and their crones and giving out bad loans again to the management and their cronies. In the end they are unable to get back most of the loans leading to high NPAs. The latest episode that some PSU banks supplied huge sums of new currency to the senior gvot officials in the city who are now caught by the IT. Thank god IT is from the centre, else it would have been hushed up. PSUs like Air India should have been privatized long back. Every political party has made use of AI to the maximum. No wonder AI suffers. Can it make profit continuously without govt infusing funds?

As Murali sir pointed out "Is the government going to be using the windfall gains out of the demonetisation exercise to recapitalise the PSU banks?”. In fact Kejriwal pointed out that this may be adjusted to the budget and show that the economy is doing very well. He may be right to some extent. When u see the interest rates are being cut, that shows economy is in a bad shape. We have a FM who is totally out of touch with the reality. He is a rich man, does not know how things are outside. RBI governor is a Gujju and out of touch and is a close confidant of the PM. What else u need. 

murali772's picture

time to dump wannabe messiah's?

171 users have liked.

It is true that demonetisation is a big bang — in the sense that it is accompanied by a terrific amount of noise, and nobody is sure for a while exactly what the explosion has destroyed. It is false, however, that demonetisation is any kind of transformational reform. In fact, given that it is statist in orientation, reduces choices for market participants, depends enormously on inefficient government machinery, and increases the costs of doing business for the foreseeable future, it is on pretty much every count the opposite of “reform”.

- - -  In one stroke, demonetisation has rendered that argument specious. Narendra Modi has shown that if he has chosen so far to avoid transformational economic reform, it is not because he is worried about the disruption it would cause or the political opposition it would create — no, it is because he simply is not interested in doing it. Who now can claim that privatisation of big public-sector monopolies or administrative reform or labour law reform was off the table because Mr Modi was forced towards incrementalism? If you decide to plunge the world’s third-largest economy into a liquidity crisis overnight, then you cannot be described as being too cautious for shock therapy.

And as for what it reveals about the policy-making in this government — well, the less said, the better. Demonetisation cannot be defended as a good idea, poorly implemented. The first rule of governing India is that you only make the policies you can implement. If we ignore implementation, then no doubt the Licence Raj was a brilliant idea, too. No, demonetisation has to be either a good idea or a bad idea to begin with, with a clear-eyed estimation of the implementation difficulties being an integral part of the decision-making process.

And that is where the government’s weaknesses have been thrown into sharp relief. Not only is this the extreme example of a general problem — that this government is absurdly top-heavy, with all major initiatives coming from the prime minister’s office. But it is also emblematic of all the government’s other policy-making weaknesses: A tendency to think in terms of headlines, not of effects; a pernicious distrust of expertise; and a tendency towards statism.

- - - I do not deny that demonetisation is currently politically popular. It may remain so — only in long-suffering India, perhaps, will already trodden-on people accept additional inconvenience if assured that everyone else is suffering too. Given that, immediate political popularity is not how this decision should be judged. Its implementation shows that, far from being an efficient manager, Mr Modi fails comprehensively when it comes to thinking at scale. Its nature proves that, far from being a reformer constrained by politics, Mr Modi is simply a statist who thinks only in terms of politics. And its conception demonstrates that this government is simply too amateurish in terms of economic policy-making to properly address India’s deep, deep problems. Politically popular or not, the reputation of this government and its leaders should not survive this disastrous experiment.

To read the full text (emphasis added by me) of this brilliant column by Mihir S Sharma, in the Business Standard, click here.

I can't but agree with all of what the author has stated. It's such a pity. The country had laid so much hope in NaMo and elected him as the PM with such majority, quite like Delhi citizenry reposing their faith in Arvind Kejriwal (on him, check out here) and electing him as the CM, again with vast majority. Sadly, both now seem to be letting down their electorate, rather the country itself.

The problem apparently is that we are all looking for messiah's, when, in fact, there can't be any.

Shobha De in her column in the ToI (for the full text, click here) has written "This move is going to cost. Big time. Cost whom? Well — just one man. Narendra Modi. Not the BJP? Nope. Him! PM Modi. Why? Simple, my dear Bharatwaasis — this demonetisation move is seen as his brainchild. A solo act. A solitary decision taken without consulting colleagues. Or thinking about consequences. From all accounts, his cabinet buddies are far from amused. In fact, some are said to be livid".

May be time to dump wannabe messiah's and look for genuine leaders.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Govern the clean way

189 users have liked.

The Delhi government should have some powers. Otherwise, it cannot function, the Supreme Court on Wednesday observed, while listing for final disposal the appeal of the AAP government against the high court verdict which had held that the L-G was the administrative head of national capital.

- - - Senior advocate Gopal Subramanium, appearing for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government, said they are challenging the order of the high court which has ruled that the Lieutenant Governor (L-G) was the administrative head and whose prior consent is needed in all administrative decisions. He said the high court had held the aid and advice of council of ministers are not binding upon the L-G. "The elected government in Delhi cannot appoint the chief secretary or cannot even appoint a class-IV officer by itself," Subramanium said, noting that under the constitutional scheme of things the council of ministers is required to give aid and advice to the L-G. He said the Constitution mandates that when there is difference of opinion on any issue, the matter could be referred to the President.

For the full text of the report (emphasis added by me) in the Business Standard, click here.

Compared to the many peculiar observations coming from the SC, of recent, this one will be seen as most welcome by all impartial observers of the goings on. And, the Modi Sarkar will do well to accept them positively, even from a political angle, particularly considering the rather vulnerable position it has got itself into through its demonetisation experiment.

One hopes that that at least now it learns that it was voted to power by a large majority to govern the 'clean' way, and not through crooked means (see my post, captioned "Namo Sarkar's self goals", of the 30th Oct, scrolling above). In it lies its path to success in future, particularly considering the increased deepening of the democratic process in the country today, thanks to the media, including the social media. 

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

statism worse than of the Marxist kind!!!

183 users have liked.

If banks are the heart of an economy, India has a hole in the heart. Up to 20% of public sector bank loans are impaired. Chief economic advisor Arvind Subramanian says India is being held back by a “twin balance sheet problem”— dodgy balance sheets of banks as well as its borrowers, burdened with huge, unrepayable debts.

This can be resolved only by the banks taking a big “haircut’ — writing off a big chunk of unrepayable loans. But this will spur accusations of cronyism, which Narendra Modi seeks to avoid at any cost.

Subramanian says only political courage can cut through the Gordian knot. He suggests creating a “bad bank” to take over the impaired loans and dispose of them at whatever discount the market requires. Finance minister Jaitley is very wary of financing a “bad bank”, and the private sector won’t. The impasse continues.

Two-third of impaired loans relate to 24 big companies, mainly in infrastructure and steel. India needs most of them for its proposed infrastructure push, but they will remain hobbled unless they get a haircut.

For the full text (emphasis added by me) of the column by the redoubtable Swaminathan Aiyar, in the SToI, click here.

Now, this precarious state of the Public Sector banks was quite well known even as the NaMo government took charge over three years back. In fact, the matter was an election issue too, using which BJP got the better of the UPA govt. Dr Raghuran Rajan, as the RBI Governor, very clearly pointed to the need to correct the situation, and, given his overall standing, the government could very easily have got away "bailing out" the banks, and even claiming credit for it. But, unfortunately, the opportunity was squandered, and instead we saw the demonetisation experiment being played out, the outcomes of which appear more hurtful than helpful, to the economy in general, and the aam aadmi, in particular.

And, as if all of that was not enough, the government now appears headed to make things worse, going by a reading of the following excerpts from a column by Shankkar Aiyar, in the New Indian Express (for the full text, click here):

The national carrier (Air India) is yet again on the “rescue me” queue. This time—after sinking public monies and staking sovereign guarantees—the government is looking at an “innovative” bailout. The innovation: conversion of Rs 28,000 crore, out of the Rs 46,570 crore the airline owes 31 institutions, into equity, induct professionals with proven skills and  listing of the airline.

Simplicity can be seductive. Effectively, lenders are expected to forsake interest earnings for a slice of ownership and the promise of dividend—ownership in a flailing enterprise ranked third worst-performing in 2016, and returns from an airline that has reported net losses of Rs 6,279 crore, Rs 5,859 crore and Rs 3,836 crore in the past three years.

Who takes the hit? The price will be borne by the depositors and shareholders of the 31 banks, the Life Insurance Corporation and the Employees Provident Fund Organisation. Remember that the banks are already reeling under gross NPAs of around Rs 7 trillion (roughly over $100 billion), and public sector banks desperately need capital infusion of around Rs 1.10 lakh crore. Embedded in the idea is a moral hazard—would this munificence be a precedent for other public sector enterprises (PSEs) that are ailing?

Forget talk of reforms, what we are seeing is "statism" worse than of the Marxist kind.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

never to be squandered opportunity

176 users have liked.

If you treat mass closures of abattoirs as a moral Hindu crusade, your political future is less assured than you think. One reason for your Bihar debacle was the beef-eating controversy, which put off not only Muslims and Dalits but secular Hindus dismayed by your shift from “vikas” to Hindutva.

Despite your UP victory, electoral numbers show you are vulnerable to a maha-gathbandhan (united opposition), and to a modest shift in the popular vote. The more you portray aggressive Hindutva, the more you drive away voters in the middle.

- - - As a non-partisan analyst, I predicted your parliamentary victory in 2014, your Bihar defeat in 2015, and your recent victory in UP. If your anti-beef movement cripples the meat and leather industries, I predict you will not only impoverish lakhs but alienate centrist voters and fuel an anti-BJP front.

For the full text of the column by Swaminathan Aiyer in SToI, click here.
This is the re-assuring part of Indian democracy - that even a Modi can be defeated if he doesn't do right by the electorate. But, one hopes it doesn't come to that, but instead he uses the God-given opportunity to good by his people.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

reality, and thereby a sense of foreboding

144 users have liked.
Decades of socialism seem to have endowed Leviathan with some kind of artificial intelligence, gradually transforming it into a deep state.
- - - Worse, anti-business attitudes are hardening. Minister of state for corporate affairs PP Chaudhary said in an interview, “The ministry has recently set up Centralised Scrutiny and Prosecution Mechanism (CSPM) to examine the records of top 1,000 firms which are mandated to spend on CSR. The ministry after an inquiry has sent preliminary notices to 272 companies for violations committed during 2015-16. In the previous year, penal action was initiated against 254 companies in this regard.”
In other words, India will soon become the only country in the world – and first in the history of mankind – where somebody could be thrown behind bars for not being philanthropic, even for not being philanthropic enough.
This brings us to the fourth observation: statist policies are exasperating the wealthy and wealth creators. In March, a Morgan Stanley survey said that about 23,000 dollar millionaires left the country since 2014. Dirigisme triggered this quit India movement.
And, finally, there is non-stop state intervention. In cosmology, there is a view called steady state theory. It states that the universe is expanding steadily while getting created continuously. While this theory doesn’t enjoy much support among astronomers today, its analogue in India’s political economy still holds sway. The deep state incessantly generates anti-business rules and regulations. Governments come and go; statism stays the same.
For the full text of the column by Mr Ravi Shanker Kapoor in the ToI, click here
This indeed seems to be the reality, and therefore the most depressing 'read' I have come across in the recent past. 
Just a few weeks back, I had mailed my daughter's good friend, who had to return to India, in spite of having achieved excellence abroad in her chosen field of work, because of the restrictions imposed by the country, as below:
For my generation, and quite a few to follow, the thing to do was to somehow get a degree (best would be in engg, or medicine), and somehow get across to the US/ UK, may be get a masters degree too, get a job (get married, spouse preferably from back home) and settle down there to a cushy life. All of that has changed now, due to 'native' protectionism, which perhaps was an inevitable reaction to the world opening up more and more. And, when things have reached a stage where even someone of the stature of Mr Arvind Subramanian, the former Chief Economic Adviser to the Modi government, says “My children in the US are now scared. They think that being brown in America is like you’re going to join the victims” (check here), you begin to wonder if you want to go there at all. So, all of those options have now narrowed. 
But, the fact of the matter is that it's our own country which is blessed with the best of resources, including human, and so, all of the action can happen here to take us to the top of the world, if only we can get our governance act together. 
Now, you have had the fortune of having received the best of education, as also the best of professional experience in your chosen field. Hold your head high and pursue your line of interest. I am sure you will make it big, sooner than later. All the very best.  
But, after reading Mr Kapoor's column, I am not sure I want to continue advising youngsters in the same tone. 
Whatever, as far as I am concerned, I am going to be dedicating the rest of my life to unshackling the country from this vice-like grip of pseudo-Socialism for the sake of the future of the youth of this country, most of whom don't have the choice of finding refuge abroad.


Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

another lost opportunity

147 users have liked.
Then there is a set of voters that aligned with the BJP largely because of its developmental agenda, thanks to Mr Modi’s image the aura around his work in Gujarat. They share no particular affinity for the Hindutva part of the proposition, seeing as a necessary if somewhat undesirable price to pay for their support of the party. This lot has seen a clear erosion of support, with a sense that their hopes of transformative change have been belied and the increasingly strident noises being made by the party on the Hindutva is making them uncomfortable.
- - - The problem that the BJP faces is that whenever it finds itself on the back foot, regardless of what is a strategically more productive path to take, its natural instinct is to go deeper and more aggressively into the cultural side of its proposition. The preliminary analyses within the party after these results, indicate that the losses are being interpreted as arising out of too little rather than too much Hindutva.  
For the full text of the column by Mr Santosh Desai, in the ToI, click here
Perhaps, I belong to the set described in the first para above. Well, as far as the country is concerened, one may say that is a case of another great opportunity lost, quite like when it was led by Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, and A B Vajpayee (about the best, so far).
Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

losing it all

143 users have liked.
Like the use of religion in politics, anti-corruption works more as a totem for the consolidation of political identity than a genuine desire to clean the system.
- - - So if the political risks of using the CBI and ED in this way against a large number of leaders is so high, why would the BJP do it? It is hard to believe this is about the law taking its own course. The answer is two-fold: A signal of authoritarian control, to scare off opponents. Desperation that the anti-corruption narrative has not worked for the BJP. It wants to shift the onus back onto the idea that it is the incorruptible party amongst the corrupt. Except, this horse has bolted a while ago.
For the full text of a highly readable column by the redoubtable Sri Pratap Bhanu Mehta, click here.
Can't have put it better.
Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Cows and Cane factor

117 users have liked.
If Modi does badly in Uttar Pradesh, a big factor will be the government’s policies on cows and cane; even if the BJP manages to hold on to its seats, the fact that it has been given a scare is due to these two factors. The policy on cows began with candidate Modi’s running down the ‘pink’ revolution—export of beef—in companion to the ‘green’ and ‘white’ revolutions of the past and, later, the fact that the UP government never acted firmly on the illegal actions of gaurakshaks even after incidents of lynching undoubtedly encouraged them. If those cultivating crops were hit by their poor prices, those who earned their livelihood from the dairy sector were hit by not getting money for their old cattle—this included even buffaloes—and, more important, were left paying the bill for their feed. Since 13-15 million cattle and buffaloes are slaughtered every year, assuming the business ground to a complete halt due to the gaurakshak terror, farmers would end up with a Rs 30,000 crore additional food bill across the country in just the first year, assuming a feed cost of Rs 60 per day.
And, with the menace of stray cattle, another issue came up, of them destroying crops; so, farmers had to either pay for fencing their land or had to stay up at night to guard their crops against the stray cattle.
In the case of sugarcane where, as many have pointed out, the dues from mills are currently around Rs 10,000 crore, farmers are a disgruntled lot. The problem, in this case, is that Modi’s policies were timid, aimed at maintaining the status quo for fear of alienating the powerful cane farmers.
The cane prices that the government forces sugar mills to pay—and they have to buy all the cane brought to them—are much too high. As a result, there are always large cane dues and it is quite a farce to see the government, almost every year, warning sugar mills to pay their dues, then arresting mill officials for not doing so and, when none of this works, coming up with a sugar ‘package’ from time to time to give the mills enough money to pay their dues to farmers.
This is nowhere near a solution and merely postpones the pain to another year, but no government has been able to fix this. So when analysts talk of how Modi faces the wrath of the sugarcane farmer, this is ironical since the prime minister has done his best to ensure they continue to get a largesse other farmers don’t get. Unless post-Balakot nationalism prevails, the prime minister will have to bear the brunt of his cow and cane policies; in one case, he was unacceptably aggressive, in the other, he was too passive.
For the full text of the revealing report in the Financial Express, click here

For all of the 36" chest thumping, when it comes to hard-nosed economic issues, what we see is total pusillanimity.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Rescuing Kashmiriyat

122 users have liked.
Historically, Kashmiris rejected the “two-nation theory” and decided to accede to India not only because the Indian government and Maharaja Hari Singh agreed upon the terms of an Instrument of Accession but also because of a deeper philosophical impetus. The inherent syncretism of Kashmiriyat was always going to be at odds with the sectarian outlook of the Islamic State of Pakistan. The stakeholders who spoke for Kashmir at the time of Partition were well aware of this.
Kashmiriyat has evolved from a centuries old secularism that goes back to when the region was a seat of Buddhist monasteries and Hindu ascetics. Even Guru Nanak, it is widely believed, sought out the heavenly abode on his journeys to seek enlightenment. When Islam came to the Valley it recognised this pastiche of pluralism and gave equal space and even patronage to these other philosophical traditions. The Hazratbal shrine that houses a relic thought to be the hair of prophet Mohammad, and the Pas-Pahar or the Shankaracharya temple, were sentinels of this syncretism for centuries.
Far from tethering Jammu & Kashmir to the mainland, Articles 370 and 35A in fact militate against Kashmiriyat. The provisions of these Articles discriminate between man and woman, insider and outsider. Some have gone so far as terming them xenophobic. After all, why would you view with a jaundiced disposition the children of Kashmiri women who have married outside the state? Why are they seen as a product of an insidious miscegenation? Why deny them the right to inherit and, by extension, disincentivise Kashmiri women to marry a man of their choice?
- - - Kashmir’s politicians today may be loath to admit it, but the reality is Kashmir lost its connect with the rest of India when in the late 1980s and early 1990s terrorists, reaping the jihadi whirlwind sown by the Pakistani deep state, drove Kashmiri Hindus out of the Valley.
Now that the NDA has dismantled the architecture of “otherness” by revoking Article 370 and its panoply of discriminatory laws Hindus, Sikhs and other faiths may hopefully return to the Valley as stakeholders and not outsiders. Kashmir badly needs to rescue Kashmiriyat. Its ghettoes are badly in need of new ideas. Migrants are key to renewal. Hope floats anew for the evolution of a “naya” Kashmir.
To read the full text of the column by Rahul Shivshankar, Editor-in-Chief, Times Now, click here.
His debating on TV shows has never quite impressed me. As such, I surprised myself reading his column in full in the ToI. What interested me was this talk about "Kashmiriyat". But, I am not quite sure that NaMo-AmitShah combination is the best equipped to do it.
I would have thought that if NaMo had he used the huge mandate he had, in the first tem itself, to usher in just soft Hindutva at best (to appease his votebank), instead of letting loose the likes of Adityanath and PragyaThakur on the country (as also handled the economy well), perhaps the Kashmiri's would by themselves have opted to assimilate with India, sensing the lurking danger of getting swallowed by the Pak-China combo, on their borders. But, with NaMoSarkar1 failing on those counts (and badly too), NaMoSarkar2 is now having to go about things in this questionable way - most unfortunate. 
Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

the "Indian" bloodline

90 users have liked.
On April 1st, I came across a post, on Twitter, reading as below, from  Ms Shefali Vaidya:
A Hindu man refusing to follow the #Lockdown gets beaten up by a police constable’s danda, #TableeghiJamaat Maulana refusing to let his people tested gets the NSA Ajit Doval visiting him at 2.00 am to cajole him. THIS is Indian Secularism!
I responded with:
While also @AmitShah was letting lose his goons against our own students, naani's & daadi's for expressing genuine anxiety over citizenship.
Shefali Vaidya retorted with:
Whose naanis and daadis? Maybe your bloodline comes from a mosque, mine doesn’t. Thanks.
I too have been using fairly 'aggressive' (not offensive) language in my twitter and blog posts, and have been at the receiving end of equally strongly worded retorts. But, this one took me by shock. Worse was the trolling by many of her nearly 5 lakh followers, using the filthiest of language possible. 
Actually, till then, all I knew about Shefali Vaidya was through the reading of one of her articles on the history of Goa, her native state. Well, though the article did talk about atrocities by invaders, etc (I don't recall the details), overall it came across as a well researched and well written piece. As such, I held her in fairly high esteem. But, if a person has gathered this kind of a troll army to project her views, as also to attack those who opposed her views, then that doesn't say much for her, does it? I'll leave it at that.  
And, strangely, it is the 'Hindutva' lot themselves who have been propagating the idea that all "Indians" are of Hindu origin. So, where does the 'bloodline' talk fit in?
Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

left-wing, statist sarkar

100 users have liked.
The Gujarat Model would, Mr Modi was suggesting, be different from, and better than, the Kerala Model. Among the noticeable weaknesses of the latter was that it did not really encourage private enterprise. Marxist ideology and trade union politics both inhibited this. On the other hand, the Vibrant Gujarat Summits organized once every two years when Mr Modi was Chief Minister were intended precisely to attract private investment.
This openness to private capital was, for Mr Modi's supporters, undoubtedly the most attractive feature of what he was marketing as the 'Gujarat Model'. It was this that brought to him the support of big business, and of small business as well, when he launched his campaign for Prime Minister. Young professionals, disgusted by the cronyism and corruption of the UPA regime, flocked to his support, seeing him as a modernizing Messiah who would make India an economic powerhouse. 
With the support of these groups, and many others, Narendra Modi was elected Prime Minister in May 2014.
There were other aspects of the Gujarat Model that Narendra Modi did not speak about, but which those who knew the state rather better than the Titans of Indian industry were perfectly aware of. These included the relegation of minorities (and particularly Muslims) to second-class status; the centralization of power in the Chief Minister and the creation of a cult of personality around him; attacks on the independence and autonomy of universities; curbs on the freedom of the press; and, not least, a vengeful attitude towards critics and political rivals.
These darker sides of the Gujarat Model were all played down in Mr Modi's Prime Ministerial campaign. But in the six years since he has been in power at the Centre, they have become starkly visible. The communalization of politics and of popular discourse, the capturing of public institutions, the intimidation of the press, the use of the police and investigating agencies to harass opponents, and, perhaps above all, the deification of the Great Leader by the party, the Cabinet, the Government, and the Godi Media - these have characterized the Prime Ministerial tenure of Narendra Modi. Meanwhile, the most widely advertised positive feature of the Gujarat Model before 2014 has proved to be a dud. Far from being a free-market reformer, Narendra Modi has demonstrated that he is an absolute statist in economic matters. As an investment banker who once enthusiastically supported him recently told me in disgust: "Narendra Modi is our most left-wing Prime Minister ever - he is even more left-wing than Jawaharlal Nehru".
- - -  The success of the state in the past and in the present have rested on science, transparency, decentralization, and social equality. These are, as it were, the four pillars of the Kerala Model. On the other hand, the four pillars of the Gujarat Model are superstition, secrecy, centralization, and communal bigotry. Give us the first over the second, any day. 
The above are the excerpts from an article, by the well-known historian Sri Ramachandra Guha, in The full text may be accessed here.
Being more or less in line with what I have been observing and commenting about the ways of the Modi Sarkar, all these years, I thought I'll post it here for record's sake.
Muralidhar Rao comment guidelines

Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!

about seo | blog