Skip to Content

Towards a level playing field regime?

408 users have liked.

India’s competition watchdog has fined Coal India Ltd (CIL) and three of its subsidiaries a combined Rs.1,773 crore for misusing their position as monopoly suppliers of coal to fix prices and supply poor-quality coal, and do so on conditions that favoured them over the buyers. The specific charges against Coal India, the first state-run company to be fined by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), were: supplying low-quality coal at high prices; retaining the right to unilaterally terminate contracts with buyers; not providing a fair dispute redressal mechanism; and preferring other state-owned companies over private buyers of coal.

- - - -“It is the first time the CCI has penalized a public sector company. Through its order, the CCI has rejected the contention that just because a company is a government entity it does not have commercial interests,” said M.M. Sharma, a New Delhi-based competition law expert with Vaish Associates. “It shows that the CCI is finally focusing on the aspect of competitive neutrality.

The 101-page order was put up on the CCI website on Tuesday evening. The penalty has been calculated at 3% of Coal India’s average revenue in 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12, which was Rs.52,252.09 crore, Rs.55,101.42 crore and Rs.69,952.33 crore respectively.

- - - Dipesh Dipu, an energy analyst and a partner at Jenissi Management Consultants, said that since Coal India operates in a regulated sector, and is state-controlled, the company can’t be blamed for its pricing mechanism. “Coal India marks its prices on a cost-plus basis. The only other alternative is market-based pricing which would make coal costlier,” he said. In its order the commission regulator has said that it “is not oblivious of the regulated environment in which CIL operates”. “The Commission opined that notwithstanding the overarching policy and regulatory environment, CIL has sufficient flexibility and functional independence in carrying out its commercial and contractual affairs. Such factors, however, were not found to detract from CIL and its subsidiaries operating independently of market forces and enjoying undisputed dominance in the relevant market,” the order said.

- - - -“The order could also mean that the government may be forced to amend the coal nationalization Act,” Dipu said. The Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, which governs the mining and trade of coal in the country, had nationalized all the private collieries in the country. A senior CCI official however disputed this and said that the coal nationalization act was “only a policy decision by the government” and that “signing of the FSAs had nothing to do with it.” The official didn’t want to be named.

For the full report in the LiveMint, click here

This is certainly a far cry from the MRTP Act days, and hopefully provides a route to unshackling of many other government monopoly regimes too - more specifically, bus services (check here), Railways (check here) - exciting times indeed.

Muralidhar Rao


murali772's picture

IR monopoly & Namma Railu

209 users have liked.

If not for the stranglehold of the Indian Railways, Namma Railu could perhaps have happened a lot faster.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

Where's the level playing field???

150 users have liked.

Speaking at the Second National Conference on ‘Economics of Competition Law’ organised by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the minister (Nirmala Sitharaman) said, “Public procurements have got to be opened to fair competition... and most of it is coming from defence, railways, and telecom sectors.”

- - - According to Sitharaman, the central government is balancing the privatisation process by supporting the private sector in terms of providing a level-playing field. She said that the Narendra Modi-led government at the Centre “is neither pro- nor anti-business”.

For the full text (emphasis added by me) of the report in the New Indian Express, click here.

Another report in the Financial Express, inter alia (for the full text, click here), read as below:

“The Commission observes that the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 empowers the state governments to regulate the road transport services in their respective states… In the public interest, a state government may not allow private players to operate on certain routes,” CCI said.

So then, where's the level playing field? Do we have to continue to suffer the BMTC/ KSRTC monopolies? Perhaps, I need to take up the matter with the CCI.

Ironically, it was none less than the Union Finance minister, Arun Jaitley, who had stated quite clearly that it was high time the public bus transport sector was opened out to competition from reputed private players (check here), and the Transport Bill (awaiting parliament approval - check here) has provided for it too.

Well, for all of that, it doesn't quite look like the transport mafia confederation in the state is going to be giving in so easily. Plainly, the people need to push for it, and harder too - check here.

Muralidhar Rao comment guidelines

Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!

about seo | blog