Skip to Content

Socialism - the cause of the Greek economic melt-down?

up
208 users have liked.
Economy

The following write-up (with emphasis added by me by highlighting where I felt it appropriate) on the subject reached me through a whatsapp group, yesterday, along-with a question as to whether I was the author, knowing me to be talking a similar language all along:

What is happening in Greece is the result of socialism playing out in the city square. But you won’t know that by reading papers or watching TV.

Greece has enacted entitlements which assure the citizens a royal life just because they are born in Greece. For example everybody gets pension. Everybody, means everybody. At the age of 57, you as a private or self employed person retire with full State pension. But there is another catch. If you work in a hazardous profession, you can retire with full pension at the age of 50. There are about 450 professions classified as hazardous. One of them is hairdresser. Yep, you read that right, in Greece, hairdresser is a hazardous profession.

So if you are a hairdresser, you can retire with full state pension at the age of 50.

All other entitlements- healthcare, education, unemployment benefits, housing, etc., of course are there. With these securities in place, Greeks did what all other Europeans have done: They stopped having babies. If government is there to take care of you from cradle to grave, why go to the trouble of maintaining families and having babies? Its fertility rate is just 1.41. (World Bank in fact put the figure at 1.29 in 2013.) So there are not enough Greek nephews to take care of the old age pensions and medical care of Greek uncles. Greeks are discovering the hard way two inescapable facts of life:

1. government doesn’t have infinite money.

2. Government has no money of its own.

If there are no taxpayers around, government earns nothing.

But Greek uncles say,”We don’t give a damn. We don’t care how you arrange the money. Just keep our Welfare cheques coming. Otherwise we will burn down our own cities.” The dispute right now is that Greeks want their entitlements to continue, to be paid by the rest of Europe, whereas rest of Europeans are not ready to pick up the tab. How cruel of them, those Europeans. They all profess to be socialists but are not ready to take care their poor brethren in Greece.

What is happening in Greece, and in the rest of Europe as well, is that the latest avatar of Socialism-the Welfare State- has also bombed big time. Socialists through their control of media may put any spin to it, but the fact is that their latest project of collectivising only incomes (and not means of production or property) has also ended up destroying some of the richest and most advanced countries on the planet- the Welfare States of Europe.

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money,” Margaret Thatcher famously observed. As long as other people still have money, socialists will find a way to take it, and when push comes to shove, they won’t be shy about using their own bankruptcy as a weapon. They won’t tell you today that their goal is to build a government that cannot be reformed when tomorrow doesn’t live up to their predictions.

Well, while I am no expert on Greece, or global economics, I dare say that, if the write-up reflects the overall approach of the majority of the population of Greece, or, in fact, any country, this is where they could land up.

While most others on the whatsapp group too seemed to endorse this criticism of the overall Greek outlook, one member raised a querry as to "how come the Scandinavian countries seem to get along well with Socialism". My answer to that would be that "Scandinavian countries levy very high levels of taxes, even with which the compliance levels are fairly high (which is largely impossible for a country like India, because of its huge population), providing for adequate funding of public services." But, I would still think it is unsustainable in the long run.

Whatever, I looked for contrary views, and I was forwarded this article by Paul Krugman in New York Times, where he generally says that the Greeks have already tightened their belts considerably, and that the answer could lie in reverting to their own currency allowing for flexibility in valuation in tune with the state of the economy.

There was another comment that "all they need is US$ 1.7 billion - just 0.25% of the bail-out given to the US banks", implying in general that EU biggies were being unreasonable, and holding Greeks to ransom. My answer would be that "Greece is a much smaller country, perhaps smaller than the smallest of the states comprising the US, and as such, such comparisons are not quite valid. Besides, the bail-out of the US banks was by the US itself, whereas the bail-out of Greece has necessarily to be by the EU, which poses a different problem altogether".

All in all, even with my limited knowledge, I would largely blame Socialism for the state of affairs. And, it should be a lesson for other countries too.

Muralidhar Rao
 

Comments

murali772's picture

lessons for Namma Sarkara too

up
77 users have liked.

Well, as much as for other countries, it should be a lesson for Namma Karnataka too, where our Bhagya-raaj CM avaru has been dishing out goodies to his rural brethren like there's no tomorrow (check here). And, now that the BBMP election season is on, perhaps even the urban brethren will become the beneficiaries too, but all of it leaving very little for proper growth-oriented investment. The situation has not been too different in other states too.

The NAC-led UPA government's policy initiatives too were largely Socialist oriented. Almost towards the end of the term, the Man Mohan Singh government, realising the damage it was causing the economy, attempted a few corrections. But, having been talking a different language till then, it had to go about it stealthily, landing itself taking all kinds of contradictory positions.

The effect of that is showing on the Modi sarkar too, where, even though ideologically quite distanced from Socialism, they too are finding it difficult to take that position openly, and as such, are having to continue with stealth. There's no other explanation, other than that, to continuing with Air-India in the public sector, for instance. One wonders how long it's going to take for them to shake themselves out of that mind-set.

Muralidhar Rao
murali772's picture

a contrarian view-point

up
75 users have liked.

Here's another column on the subject by Chris Kanthan in "Nation of Change" - essentially a "Socialist" point of view, vilifying in the process the banks for all that's gone wrong.

I don't know enough to comment on it more than to say that I associate government services/ products (that I have come across in India) to be largely shoddy, inefficient, uncaring, etc, compared to what we see in sectors that have been opened out to competition from the private sector.

For thse still having a problem with the word "privatisation", they may check here as to where they possibly fit in. I myself fit into some.

Muralidhar Rao

Praja.in comment guidelines

Posting Guidelines apply for comments as well. No foul language, hate mongering or personal attacks. If criticizing third person or an authority, you must be fact based, as constructive as possible, and use gentle words. Avoid going off-topic no matter how nice your comment is. Moderators reserve the right to either edit or simply delete comments that don't meet these guidelines. If you are nice enough to realize you violated the guidelines, please save Moderators some time by editing and fixing yourself. Thanks!



about seo | blog